____________________

 

Monday, March 29, 2021

FORTY-EIGHTH DAY

[DELEGATE HANSHAW, MR. SPEAKER, IN THE CHAIR]

 

 

      The House of Delegates met at 11:00 a.m., and was called to order by the Honorable Roger Hanshaw, Speaker.

      Prayer was offered and the House was led in recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance.

      The Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of Friday, March 26, 2021, being the first order of business, when the further reading thereof was dispensed with and the same approved.

Reordering of the Calendar

Pursuant to the action of the Committee on Rules, Delegate Summers announced that S. C. R. 20, on Unfinished Business, Special Calendar, had been transferred to the House Calendar; H. B. 3306, on Third reading, Special Calendar, had been transferred to the House Calendar and Com. Sub. for H. B. 2177 on Second reading, Special Calendar, had been transferred to the House Calendar; and, Com. Sub. for S. C. R. 14, had been moved to the top of Unfinished Business.

Committee Reports

Delegate Capito, Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following report, which was received:

Your Committee on the Judiciary has had under consideration:

H. B. 3307, Social Media Integrity and Anti-Corruption in Elections Act,

And reports back a committee substitute therefor, with the same title, as follows:

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3307 - “A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §3-8-12a; and, to amend said Code by adding thereto a new section designated as §55-7-32; all relating to limiting abuses by social media corporations; creating the Social Media Integrity and Anti-Corruption in Elections Act; defining terms; providing requirements for social media companies to prevent corruption and provide transparency of election-related content made available on social media websites; providing equal opportunities for all candidates and political parties to speak without policy or partisan-based censorship; propounding legislative findings; setting forth definitions; providing for the protection of the integrity of election; setting forth limitations on what social media platform can publish concerning elections without approval; ensuring election-related content hosted, posted, and made available on social media websites is not monetized or otherwise used or manipulated for nefarious purposes; requiring social media platform disseminate election content uniformly, report and retain certain information; requiring social media platform timely approve service requests by political entities; requiring social media platform equitably charge for election advertising; prohibiting certain actions by social media platform; including prohibiting the modifying visibility of election information based on type of content; listing due process requirements for restriction of access to social media platforms; setting forth certain instances in which service can be terminated by social media platform; providing limitations on information collected by social media platform; providing certain enumerated rights to candidates in their dealings with a social media platform; providing civil penalties for violations of these provisions, including asset seizure; establishing rulemaking authority; creating the Stop Social Media Censorship Act; defining terms; setting forth criminal and civil penalties for a social media provider who, without good cause, deletes or censor a user’s religious or political speech; or uses an algorithm to disfavor or censure the user’s religious or political speech; providing for right of enforcement by the Attorney General; and providing exceptions and limitations,”

With the recommendation that the committee substitute do pass.

At the respective requests of Delegate Summers, and by unanimous consent, the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 3307) was taken up for immediate consideration, read a first time and ordered to second reading.

Messages from the Executive

Delegate Hanshaw (Mr. Speaker) presented a communication from His Excellency, the Governor, advising that on March 27, 2021, he approved Com. Sub. for S. B. 295, S. B. 404, Com. Sub. for H. B. 2006, Com. Sub. for H. B. 2008 and Com. Sub. for H. B. 2013.

Messages from the Senate

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

Com. Sub. for S. B. 419 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §61-7-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to definitions of dangerous weapons; defining ‘antique firearm’; and redefining ‘firearm’ so as not to be more restrictive than the federal definition”; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

Com. Sub. for S. B. 458 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §15-5-9a of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to modifying and limiting the power of government entities regarding the possession of firearms and related products by individuals during a declared state of emergency; and allowing prevailing plaintiff to recover actual damages, court costs and fees, and attorney’s fees”; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

S. B. 521 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §30-18-9 and §30-18-10 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all relating to extending the licensure renewal term of a private investigator, security guard, and private investigator or security guard firms from one to two years”; which was referred to the Committee on Government Organization.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

Com. Sub. for S. B. 534 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §12-6C-11 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; and to amend and reenact §31-15-6 and §31-15-20 of said code, all relating generally to economic development loans and loan insurance issued by the state; clarifying provision stating that the Board of Treasury Investments has no fiduciary duty with regard to economic development loans administered by the Economic Development Authority; providing that the Board of Treasury Investments may inspect and copy, upon written notice, all records related to loans made available by the board to the Economic Development Authority; increasing the revolving loan capacity from the Board of Treasury Investments to the Economic Development Authority to an amount not to exceed $250 million; authorizing the Economic Development Authority to make working capital loans from a revolving loan fund capitalized with federal grant funds including those federal grant funds received from the United States Economic Development Administration; and clarifying that the authority is not authorized to enter into contracts or agreements with financial institutions for banking goods or services without the approval of the State Treasurer”; which was referred to the Committee on Finance.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

Com. Sub. for S. B. 585 - “A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §18-2-7g, relating to allowing the State Board of Education to develop a program of instruction in family and consumer sciences, or specific subjects within family and consumer sciences, that may be integrated into the curriculum for students in secondary schools”; which was referred to the Committee on Education.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

Com. Sub. for S. B. 601 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §6C-2-2, §6C-2-3, and §6C-2-6 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all relating to West Virginia public employee grievance procedure; establishing exceptions to the definition of ‘grievance’; requiring a signed and notarized grievance form; outlining the grievance motion to dismiss procedure; and providing for the payment of attorney’s fees upon a determination that a grievance or defense was brought in bad faith”; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

Com. Sub. for S. B. 604 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §24-6-12 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; and to amend and reenact §24A-2-2b of said code, all relating to emergency towing services; requiring county commissions to create districts whereby towing services within a district may be dispatched or implement a policy whereby all available towing services within an area currently served by an organization are dispatched on a rotating basis; defining a term; and amending the sunset and legislative review provisions”; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

S. B. 680 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §18A-4-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to allowing the State Superintendent of Schools to define classroom teachers certified in special education”; which was referred to the Committee on Education.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of

S. B. 710 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §18-5-13a of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to requiring an impact statement in certain instances of a school closing or consolidation; requiring State Board of Education rule detailing information that a county board is required to include as part of its impact statement; and setting forth minimum requirements for the rule”; which was referred to the Committee on Education.

A message from the Senate, by

The Clerk of the Senate, announced the adoption by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the adoption of the following joint resolution, which was read by its title and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary as follows:

Com. Sub. for S. J. R. 11 - “Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of West Virginia, amending section four, article VII thereof, relating to preventing any individual from serving in the office of Secretary of State, Auditor, Treasurer, Commissioner of Agriculture, or Attorney General for more than three consecutive terms; numbering and designating such proposed amendment; and providing a summarized statement of the purpose of such proposed amendment.”

Resolutions Introduced

Delegates Young, Barach, Boggs, Diserio, Doyle, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Garcia, Griffith, Hansen, Hornbuckle, Lovejoy, Pethtel, Pushkin, Rowe, Skaff, Thompson, Walker, Williams and Zukoff offered the following resolution, which was read by its title and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Resources then Rules:

H. R. 20 - “Condemning all forms of anti-Asian sentiment as related to COVID-19.”

Whereas, The use of anti-Asian terminology and rhetoric related to COVID–19, such as the “Chinese Virus”, “Wuhan Virus”, and “Kung-flu” have perpetuated anti-Asian stigma leading to harassment, assault, and scapegoating; and

Whereas, There has been a dramatic increase in reports of hate crimes and incidents against those of Asian descent since the start of the COVID–19 outbreak that has continued throughout the pandemic; and

Whereas, According to a recent report by Stop AAPI Hate, there are nearly 3,795 reported cases of anti-Asian discrimination related to COVID–19 between March 19, 2020, to February 28, 2021, with reported cases in every state; and

Whereas, The persistent discrimination, violence, vandalism, and hate crimes against Asians in the United States are placing Asian individuals and their families, communities, and businesses at risk; therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Delegates:

That the West Virginia House of Delegates condemns and denounces all forms of anti-Asian sentiment and all acts of racism, xenophobia, intolerance, discrimination, hate crimes, and hate speech against Asian Americans and Asian individuals in West Virginia and the United States; and, be it

Further Resolved, That this body asserts West Virginia’s commitment to diversity, inclusiveness, equality, and compassion, not only the United States but also for the people of other nations, global alliances, and unions to ensure that all members of the Asian community, regardless of their background, spoken language, or religious beliefs, are treated with dignity and equity; and, be it

Further Resolved, That we encourage Asian Americans and all West Virginians who experience hate crimes to report such incidents to local law enforcement, the West Virginia Human Rights Commission, and the Attorney General’s Civil Rights Division; and, be it

Further Resolved, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the Governor, the West Virginia Attorney General, and the Executive Director of the West Virginia Human Rights Commission.

Delegates Phillips, Jennings and J. Jeffries offered the following resolution, which was read by its title and referred to the Committee on Technology and Infrastructure then Rules:

H. C. R. 79 - “Requesting the Division of Highways name bridge number 47-219/00-008.84 (47A080), (39.09576, -79.66916) locally known as Blackfork Bridge, carrying US 219 over Blackfork Cheat River in Tucker county, the ‘William Mahan Harman and Louise Frances Harman Memorial Bridge’.”

Whereas, William “Lawyer Will” Mahan Harman was born on September 13, 1900, at Harman, WV, and was the son of John William and Myrtle Lillian Miley Harman. His father, John William, practiced law in Petersburg until the death of his first wife, Minnie Harman, on March 29, 1896. John William then relocated his practice to Harman in 1897 and remained there until April 1901 when he moved to Parsons; and

Whereas, William Mahan Harman, known as “Lawyer Will”, attended school in Parsons and graduated from Parsons High School in June of 1918. He attended Ohio University, Cincinnati Law School, and was graduated from the University of Southern California School of Law in 1922. After graduation, he returned to Parsons, and joined his father in the law practice. He seemed to be successful from the start and was among the leading lawyers of Tucker County. Lawyer Will continued to practice law for nearly 50 years in the county; and

Whereas, Lawyer Will married Louise Frances Poffenbarger on July 9,1924. Louise was born May 7, 1905, the daughter of William H. and Valeria Poffenbarger. Her mother owned and operated the Commercial Hotel on Main Street in Parsons. Louise graduated from Parsons High School in 1924; she was a homemaker and a member of the First United Methodist Church of Parsons and the River City Garden Club; and

Whereas, William Mahan Harman served as general counsel, vice-president and president of the First National Bank of Parsons. He was also a member of Alumnae Association of the University of Southern California, a member the American Bar Association, and the First United Methodist Church of Parsons; and

Whereas, Lawyer Will gained a fine reputation of winning many difficult cases and was recognized as one of the best criminal lawyers in the Sstate; so much so that when someone got into serious trouble it is reported they would say “Get Will Harman”; and

Whereas, In 1992, Louise Harman established the Louise Harman Fund with the Tucker Community Foundation. Its purpose is to provide funding for the upkeep of the Parsons City Cemetery, the River City and Mill Race Parks of Parsons, and the Five Rivers Public Library of Parsons; and

Whereas, In 2003, the William Mahan Harman Memorial Fund was opened within the Tucker Community Foundation, funded by the Estate of William Mahan Harman. The purpose of the Fund is to provide perpetual funding for the Parsons City Cemetery, Mill Race and River City Parks, Five Rivers Public Library, and the Citizens of Parsons, and is also managed by the Tucker Community Foundation. The Fund has since funded numerous projects, facilities, infrastructure, structures, renovation of structures, and improvements for these entities and the citizens of Parsons and Tucker County; and

Whereas, William Mahan Harman passed away August 29, 1971, and Louise Frances Harman passed away December 1, 2002. They were both interred in the Parsons City Cemetery beside each other; and

Whereas, It is fitting that an enduring memorial be established to commemorate William Mahan Harman and Louise Frances Harman and their contributions to Parsons, Tucker County, our state and country; therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia:

That the Division of Highways is hereby requested to name bridge number : 47-219/00-008.84 (47A080), (39.09576,-79.66916) locally known as Blackfork Bridge, carrying US 219 over Blackfork Cheat River in Tucker county, the “William Mahan Harman and Louise Frances Harman Memorial Bridge”; and, be it

Further Resolved, That the Division of Highways is hereby requested to have made and be placed signs identifying the bridge as the “William Mahan Harman and Louise Frances Harman Memorial Bridge”; and, be it

Further Resolved, That the Clerk of the House is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Commissioner of the Division of Highways.

Delegates Reynolds, Toney, J. Jeffries, Booth, Jennings, Barnhart, Clark, L. Pack, Riley, Hanna, Conley, Ferrell, Householder, Howell, J. Kelly, J. Pack, Rohrbach, Smith and Storch offered the following resolution, which was read by its title and referred to the Committee on Technology and Infrastructure then Rules:

H. C. R. 80 - “Requesting the Division of Highways name a portion of US Route 250, beginning at mile marker 31.35, and ending at its intersection with WV 2, mile marker 31.63, in Marshall County, the ‘U. S. Marine Corps LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. Memorial Road’.”

Whereas, Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. was born on July 18, 1948, in Marshall County, and was the son of Leonard Joe Zelaski, Sr. and Betty Leola Liston Zelaski; and

Whereas, Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. entered the U.S. Marine Corps on December 1, 1966; he began his tour of duty in Vietnam on May 13, 1967, where he served as a Mortarman in K Company, 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines Regiment of the 1st Marine Division; and

Whereas, LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. was killed in a hostile action by hostile small arms fire northeast of Dong Ha, Quang Tri Provence, South Vietnam on March 2, 1968, during Operation Napoleon/Saline, in which 31 other U. S. Troops also lost their lives; and

Whereas, U. S. Marine Corps LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. arrived home to West Virginia on March 13, 1968, and was interred in Riverview Cemetery, Moundsville, West Virginia; and

Whereas, U. S. Marine Corps LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. received the following commendations and awards in honor of his service in the U.S. Marine Corps: the Purple Heart, Combat Defense Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Marine Corps Presidential Unit Citation, Vietnam Gallantry Cross, Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal, and the Marine Corps Expeditionary Medal; and

Whereas, U.S. Marine Corps LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr.’s name is inscribed on the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, D. C. on Panel 42E, Line 045, in recognition of his service and his ultimate sacrifice for our country; and

Whereas, It is fitting that an enduring memorial be established to commemorate U.S. Marine Corps LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr., honoring his life and his contributions to our state and country; therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia:

That the Division of Highways is hereby requested to name a portion of US Route 250, beginning at mile marker 31.35, and ending at its intersection with WV 2, mile marker 31.63, in Marshall County, the “U. S. Marine Corps LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. Memorial Road”; and, be it

Further Resolved, That the Division of Highways is hereby requested to have made and be placed signs at both ends identifying the portion of road as the “U. S. Marine Corps LCpl Leonard Joe Zelaski, Jr. Memorial Road”; and, be it

Further Resolved, That the Clerk of the House of Delegates is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Commissioner of the Division of Highways.

Special Calendar

Unfinished Business

Com. Sub. for S. C. R. 14, Creating WV Women’s Suffrage Memorial; coming up in regular order, as unfinished business, was reported by the Clerk and adopted.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates.

The following resolutions, coming up in regular order as unfinished business, were reported by the Clerk, and in the absence of objection, considered en masse, and adopted:

S. C. R. 6, US Navy Seaman 2nd Class Wilbur ‘Webb’ Hahn and John W. Hahn Memorial Bridge,

S. C. R. 8, Fire Chief Kenneth Junior Russell Memorial Bridge,

H. C. R. 20, Bill Withers Memorial Road,

Com. Sub. for H. C. R. 43, U. S. Army CSM Hugh H. ‘Smokey’ Stover Memorial Road,

H. C. R. 54, Robin W. Ames Memorial Road,

H. C. R. 62, Major Samuel Wilson Rogers Jr. Memorial Bridge,

H. C. R. 63, “Mayor George Karos Bridge”,

H. C. R. 64, Deputy Sheriff Scott D. Myers Memorial Bridge,

And,

H. C. R. 72, David Allen Drake, Sr. Memorial Bridge.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein on those requiring the same.

Third Reading

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2747, Transferring the Parole Board to the Office of Administrative Hearings; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 308), and there were—yeas 73, nays 25, absent and not voting 2, with the nays and the absent and not voting being as follows:

Nays: Barach, Bates, Boggs, Brown, Bruce, Diserio, Doyle, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Griffith, Hanna, Hansen, J. Jeffries, Lovejoy, McGeehan, Pethtel, Pushkin, Rowe, Skaff, Thompson, Walker, Wamsley, Williams, Young and Zukoff.

Absent and Not Voting: Hornbuckle and Kessinger.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2747) passed.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2773, Permitting DNR to issue up to 100 permits for boats greater than 10 horsepower on Upper Mud River Lake; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 309), and there were—yeas 98, nays none, absent and not voting 2, with the absent and not voting being as follows:

Absent and Not Voting: Hornbuckle and Kessinger.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2773) passed.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2793, Permit out of state residents to obtain West Virginia concealed carry permits; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 310), and there were—yeas 98, nays none, absent and not voting 2, with the absent and not voting being as follows:

Absent and Not Voting: Hornbuckle and Kessinger.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2793) passed.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2890, To clarify the regulatory authority of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia over luxury limousine services; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 311), and there were—yeas 75, nays 24, absent and not voting 1, with the nays and the absent and not voting being as follows:

Nays: Bates, Brown, Capito, Conley, Criss, Diserio, Doyle, Fleischauer, Garcia, Hansen, D. Kelly, J. Kelly, Lovejoy, Pushkin, Queen, Rowe, Skaff, Summers, Thompson, Toney, Walker, Young, Zatezalo and Zukoff.

Absent and Not Voting: Hornbuckle.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2890) passed.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2962, Relating generally to dental practice; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 312), and there were—yeas 100, nays none, absent and not voting none.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2962) passed.

On motion of Delegate J. Pack, the title of the bill was amended to read as follows:

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2962 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §30-4-8, §30-4-10, §30-4-13, §30-4-15, §30-4-16, §30-4-17, §30-4-19, §30-4-20, §30-4-22, §30-4-23, and §30-4-24 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all relating to the practice of dentistry; updating the requirements for a license to practice dentistry; updating the requirements for a license to practice as a dental hygienist; requiring a board authorization be present in the place of practice; making technical corrections to special volunteer dentists; requiring payment for certain examinations; permitting the formation of a professional limited liability companies; updating the complaint process; updating the criteria used when considering disciplinary action; updating the types of disciplinary sanctions; requiring providing criminal penalties; clarifying that a student enrolled in an accredited dental program may, under the supervision of a licensed dentist or dental hygienist perform certain tasks under certain conditions without necessitating a license; and making technical changes.”

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3002, Update road abandonment process; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 313), and there were—yeas 100, nays none, absent and not voting none.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 3002) passed.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

H. B. 3300, Relating to reducing personal income tax rates generally; on third reading, coming up in regular order, with amendments pending, was reported by the Clerk.

On motion of Delegate Householder, the bill was amended on page three, section four-g, following line seventy-six, by inserting a new subdivision to read as follows:

“(6) For tax years beginning January 1, 2022, and each year thereafter, the marriage penalty is abolished. The Tax Commissioner shall by emergency rule and proposed legislative rule provide for the elimination of the marriage penalty under this article effective January 1, 2022, to the end that persons married to each other shall pay no more taxes each year under this article than the least amount of taxes that may be imposed upon their incomes regardless of whether they file jointly or separately.

On page four, section thirty-three, line ten, following the words “on and after”, by striking out the words “January 1, 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “July 1, 2022”, followed by a comma.

On page four, section thirty-three, line seventeen, following the words “on and after”, by striking out the words “January 1, 2021” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “July 1, 2022”, followed by a comma.

On page five, section thirty-three, line twenty-nine, following the words “on and after”, by striking out the words “January 1, 2021” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “July 1, 2022”, followed by a comma.

On page five, section thirty-three, beginning on line thirty-six, following the words “on and after”, by striking out the words “July 1, 2021” and the period, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “July 1, 2022”, followed by a period.

On page five, section thirty-three, line forty-one, following the words “on and after”, by striking out the words “January 1, 2021” and the period, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “July 1, 2022”, followed by a period.

On page five, section thirty-three, line forty-five, following the words “on and after”, by striking out the words “January 1, 2021” and the period, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “July 1, 2022”, followed by a period.

On page five, section thirty-three, line forty-eight, following the word “thereof” and the comma, by inserting the words “on and after July 1, 2022”, followed by a comma.

On page six, section thirty-three, beginning on line fifty-nine, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter”, followed by a comma.

On page six, section thirty-three, beginning on line sixty-eight, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter”, followed by a comma.

On page six, section thirty-three, beginning on line seventy-seven, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter”, followed by a comma.

On page seven, section thirty-three, beginning on line eighty-six, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter”, followed by a comma.

On page seven, section thirty-three, beginning on line ninety-five, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter”, followed by a comma.

On page seven, section thirty-three, beginning on line one hundred four, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter”, followed by a comma.

On page eight, section thirty-three, beginning on line one hundred thirteen, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter, followed by a comma.

And,

On page eight, section thirty-three, beginning on line one hundred twenty-five, following the words “to the contrary” and the comma, by striking out the words “beginning in January of 2022” and the comma, and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter”, followed by a comma.

      Delegate Bates moved to amend the bill on page 5, section 33, line 53, by striking out the word “and” and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

      “(8) The net amount of the state’s share of gross revenues received in the future for any tax collected from sales of non-medical cannabis to adults, upon enactment by the Legislature of state law providing for the legalization and taxation of sales of non-medical cannabis to adults; and”

      And,

Renumbering existing subsection (8) accordingly.

On the adoption of the amendment, the yeas and nays were demanded which demand was sustained.

The yeas and nays having been ordered, they were taken (Roll No. 314), and there were—yeas 29, nays 71, absent and not voting none, with the yeas being as follows:

Yeas: Barach, Bates, Bridges, Brown, Bruce, Dean, Diserio, Doyle, Evans, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Garcia, Griffith, Hansen, Higginbotham, Hornbuckle, Lovejoy, Martin, McGeehan, Nestor, Pushkin, Rowe, Skaff, Thompson, Walker, Wamsley, Williams, Young and Zukoff.

So, a majority of the members present not having voted in the affirmative, the amendment was rejected.

There being two strike and insert amendments, the Speaker explained to the members that the sponsors would be allowed to explain their amendments but the adoption of one would preclude the consideration of the other.

Delegates Doyle, Boggs, Williams and Hornbuckle offered an amendment for which Delegate Doyle was recognized to explain, as follows:

On page 1, following the enacting clause, by striking out the remainder of the bill and inserting in lieu thereof, the following:

“§11-21-4g.  A tax cut that helps working families.

(a) Tax reduction on individuals (except married individuals filing separate returns) filing joint returns, heads of households, estates, and trusts – For the calendar year of 2022, individuals filing joint returns, heads of households, and estates and trusts income tax shall be reduced by $300 for the taxable year from the tax rate as provided for pursuant to §11-21-4e of this code, and any taxpayers that owe less than $300 in tax, the tax will be zero for that tax year and any remaining tax credit carried over to the following tax year.

(b) Tax reduction for married individuals filing separate returns.- For the Calendar year of 2022, for a husband and wife filing separate returns under this article, state income tax shall be reduced by $150 for the taxable year from the tax rate as provided for pursuant to §11-21-4e of this code, and for any taxpayer that owes less than $150 in tax, the tax will be zero for that tax year and any remaining tax credit carried over to the following tax year.”

Delegate Bates offered an amendment for which the Delegate was recognized to explain, as follows:

            On page 1, following the enacting clause, by striking out the remainder of the bill and inserting in lieu thereof, the following:

“§11-21-4e. Rate of tax — Taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1987; taxable years after December 31, 2022.

(a) Rate of tax on individuals (except married individuals filing separate returns), individuals filing joint returns, heads of households, estates and trusts. — The tax imposed by section three of this article §11-21-3 of this code on the West Virginia taxable income of every individual (except married individuals filing separate returns); every individual who is a head of a household in the determination of his or her federal income tax for the taxable year; every husband and wife who file a joint return under this article; every individual who is entitled to file his or her federal income tax return for the taxable year as a surviving spouse; and every estate and trust shall be determined in accordance with the following table:

If the West Virginia

taxable income is:                                                                      The tax is:

Not over $10,000                                                                       3% of the taxable income

Over $10,000 but not                                                                 $300.00 plus 4% of excess

            over $25,000                                                                              over $10,000

Over $25,000 but not                                                                 $900.00 plus 4.5% of excess

            over $40,000                                                                              over $25,000

Over $40,000 but not                                                                 $1,575.00 plus 6% of excess

            over $60,000                                                                              over $40,000

Over $60,000                                                                             $2,775.00 plus 6.5% of excess

                                                                                                               over $60,000

(b) Rate of tax on married individuals filing separate returns. — In the case of husband and wife filing separate returns under this article for the taxable year, the tax imposed by section three of this article §11-21-3 of this code on the West Virginia taxable income of each spouse shall be determined in accordance with the following table:

If the West Virginia

taxable income is:                                                                         The tax is:

Not over $5,000                                                                            3% of the taxable income

Over $5,000 but not                                                                      $150.00 plus 4% of excess

                  over $12,500                                                                           over $5,000

Over $12,500 but not                                                                    $450.00 plus 4.5% of

                  over $20,000                                                                           excess over $12,500

Over $20,000 but not                                                                    $787.50 plus 6% of excess

                  over $30,000                                                                           over $20,000

Over $30,000                                                                                $1,387.50 plus 6.5% of

                                                                                                                  excess over $30,000

(c) Applicability of this section. — The provisions of this section, as amended by this act, shall be applicable in determining the rate of tax imposed by this article for all taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, and shall be in lieu of the rates of tax specified in section four-d of this article §11-21-4d of this code. The provisions of this section, as amended by this act in 2021, and of §11B-2-33 of this code shall be applicable in determining the rate of tax imposed by this article for all taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022, and shall be in lieu of the rates of tax specified in this section upon the occurrence of the events specified in §11B-2-33 of this code.

CHAPTER 11B. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

ARTICLE 2. STATE BUDGET OFFICE.

§11B-2-33. Personal income tax reduction fund.

(a) The personal income tax reduction fund is hereby established. The personal income tax reduction fund shall be funded continuously and on a revolving basis in accordance with this section, with all interest or other earnings on the moneys therein credited to the fund. The personal income tax reduction fund shall be funded as provided by this section, by other provisions of this code, and by any appropriation made to the fund by the Legislature. Moneys in the personal income tax reduction fund may be expended solely for the purposes set forth in this section.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, moneys to be deposited in the personal income tax reduction fund include:

(1) Not more than $3 million annually of the net amount of all West Virginia state sales and use tax collections on all sales made on and after January 1, 2022, in which the internet was used to order, ship, or buy a product, on-line, but only where the sale was made by an out of state vendor that registered with the State Tax Division for the first time on or after January 1, 2022, to collect and remit state sales and use taxes to the state.  The State Tax Commissioner shall deposit the amounts as required by this section into the fund;

(2) The net amount of the state’s share of the gross sales received by the State Lottery Commission that are derived from lottery games authorized under §29-22-1 et seq. of this code on and after January 1, 2021, that utilize an electronic computer and a video screen to operate a lottery game and communicate the results thereof, such as the games of “Travel” or “Keno”, and which do not utilize an interactive electronic terminal device allowing input by an individual player, that are made available by the State Lottery Commission in locations other than: (A) Private clubs licensed in accordance with the provisions of §60-7-1 et seq. of this code; (B) retail licensees licensed in accordance with the provisions of §60-3A-1 et seq. of this code; or (C) in the facilities of class A licensees which are licensed in accordance with the provisions of §11-16-9 of this code, in which facility at least 75 percent of the nonintoxicating beer sold by the class A licensee in the preceding year was sold for consumption on the premises. The State Lottery Commission shall deposit the amounts as required by this section into the fund;

(3) The net amount of the state’s share of gross terminal income received by the State Lottery Commission that are derived from lottery games that are derived from limited video lottery operations authorized under §29-22B-1 et seq. of this code on and after January 1, 2021, that are operated at a retail location by a licensed operator authorized by the State Lottery Commission to operate limited video lottery terminals as a limited video lottery retailer. The State Lottery Commission shall deposit the amounts as required by this section into the fund;

(4) The net amount of the state’s share of gross revenues received by the State Lottery Commission that are derived from racetrack video lottery terminals at a secondary location of a licensed racetrack authorized under §29-22A-1 et seq. of this code on and after January 1, 2021. The State Lottery Commission shall deposit the amounts as required by this section into the fund;

(5) The net amount of the state’s share of gross revenues received by the State Lottery Commission that are derived from racetrack table games at a secondary location of a licensed racetrack authorized under §29-22C-1 et seq. of this code on and after January 1, 2021. The State Lottery Commission shall deposit the amounts as required by this section into the fund;

(6) The net amount of the state’s share of gross revenues received by the State Lottery Commission that are derived from sports wagering at a secondary location of a licensed racetrack authorized under §29-22D-1 et seq. of this code on and after January 1, 2021. The State Lottery Commission shall deposit the amounts as required by this section into the fund;

(7) The net amount of the state’s share of gross revenues received by the State Lottery Commission that are derived from interactive gaming at a primary or secondary location of a licensed racetrack authorized under §29-22E-1 et seq. of this code on and after January 1, 2021. The State Lottery Commission shall deposit the amounts as required by this section into the fund;

(8) After depositing the amounts into the Revenue Shortfall Reserve Fund as required under §11B-2-20 of this code, 25 percent of all surplus revenues described in that section; and

(9) All other amounts directed to be deposited into the fund by any provision of this code or appropriation.

(c)(1) If at the end of any fiscal year the personal income tax reduction fund is funded at an amount equal to or exceeding 2.5 times the total net reduction in personal income tax revenue collections that would have been received in that fiscal year if the income tax rates for that fiscal year had been reduced by 0.25 percent, the Secretary of Revenue shall certify the same to the State Tax Commissioner on or before the next ensuing July 31.

(2) Upon the certification, for all taxable years beginning on or after the next ensuing January 1, the tax imposed by §11-21-3 of this code shall, in lieu of the provisions of §11-21-4e of this code, be imposed in accordance with the following as if fully set forth therein: The Tax Commissioner shall publish by administrative notice the provisions set forth in §11-21-4e of this code after reducing each percentage by 0.25 percent, which published provisions shall for all taxable years beginning on or after the next ensuing January 1, be the tax imposed by §11-21-3 of this code in lieu of the provisions of §11-21-4e of this code.

(3) Upon the certification, on the next ensuing July 1, the Secretary of Revenue shall transfer the sum of the multiplication described in subdivision (1) of this subsection from the personal income tax reduction fund to the General Revenue Fund of the state.

(d)(1) After the occurrence of the events described in subdivision (1), subsection (c) of this section, if at the end of any fiscal year the personal income tax reduction fund is funded at an amount equal to or exceeding two and one half times the total net reduction in personal income tax revenue collections that would have been received in that fiscal year if the income tax rates for that fiscal year had been reduced by 0.25 percent, less the amount required to be transferred by subdivision (3), subsection (c) of this section, if required, the Secretary of Revenue shall certify the same to the State Tax Commissioner on or before the next ensuing July 31.

(2) Upon the certification, for all taxable years beginning on or after the next ensuing January 1, the tax imposed by §11-21-3 of this code shall, in lieu of the provisions of §11-21-4e of this code, be imposed in accordance with the following as if fully set forth therein: The Tax Commissioner shall publish by administrative notice the provisions set forth in §11-21-4e of this code after reducing each percentage by an additional 0.25 percent to the same effect of reducing those percentages as provided by subdivision (2), subsection (c) of this section, which published provisions shall for all taxable years beginning on or after the next ensuing January 1, be the tax imposed by §11-21-3 of this code in lieu of the provisions of §11-21-4e of this code.

(3) Upon the certification, on the next ensuing July 1, the Secretary of Revenue shall transfer the sum of the multiplication described in subdivision (1) of this subsection from the personal income tax reduction fund to the General Revenue Fund of the state.

(e) The moneys in the personal income tax reduction fund shall be made available to the West Virginia Board of Treasury Investments for management and investment of the moneys in accordance with the provisions of §12-6C-1 et seq. of this code and to the West Virginia Investment Management Board for management and investment of the moneys in accordance with the provisions of §12-6-1 et seq. of this code in such amounts as may be directed in the discretion of the Secretary of Revenue. Any balance of the personal income tax reduction fund, including accrued interest and other return earned thereon at the end of any fiscal year, shall not revert to the General Fund but shall remain in the personal income tax reduction fund for the purposes set forth in this section.”

During debate on the amendments, Delegate Bates asked and obtained unanimous consent that his strike and insert amendment be withdrawn.

On the adoption of the amendment offered by Delegates Doyle, Boggs, Williams and Hornbuckle, the yeas and nays were demanded, which demand was sustained.

The yeas and nays having been ordered, they were taken (Roll No. 315), and there were—yeas 23, nays 77, absent and not voting none, with the yeas being as follows:

Yeas: Barach, Bates, Boggs, Brown, Diserio, Doyle, Evans, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Garcia, Griffith, Hansen, Hornbuckle, Lovejoy, Pethtel, Pushkin, Rowe, Skaff, Thompson, Walker, Williams, Young and Zukoff.

So, a majority of the members present not having voted in the affirmative, the amendment was rejected.

Having been engrossed, the bill was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 316), and there were—yeas 77, nays 23, absent and not voting none, with the nays being as follows:

Nays: Barach, Boggs, Brown, Conley, Diserio, Doyle, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Garcia, Griffith, Hansen, Hornbuckle, Lovejoy, Miller, Pethtel, Pushkin, Rowe, Skaff, Thompson, Walker, Williams, Young and Zukoff.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (H. B. 3300) passed.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

H. B. 3303, Relating to clarifying the process of filling vacancies on ballots; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 317), and there were—yeas 98, nays none, absent and not voting 2, with the absent and not voting being as follows:

Absent and Not Voting: Linville and Williams.

So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (H. B. 3303) passed.

Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Second Reading

      Com. Sub. for S. B. 275, Relating generally to WV Appellate Reorganization Act of 2021; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time.

An amendment recommended by the Committee on Finance, was reported by the Clerk, on page five, following the enacting clause, by striking out the remainder of the bill and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

CHAPTER 3. ELECTIONS.

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS.

§3-1-16. Election of state officers.

(a) At the general election to be held in 1968, and every fourth year thereafter, there shall be elected a Governor, Secretary of State, Treasurer, Auditor, Attorney General and Commissioner of Agriculture. At the general election in 1968, and every second year thereafter, there shall be elected a member of the State Senate for each senatorial district, and a member or members of the House of Delegates of the state from each county or each delegate district.

(b) At the time of the primary election to be held in the year 2016, and every twelfth year thereafter, there shall be elected one justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, and at the time of the primary election to be held in 2020, and every twelfth year thereafter, two justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals and at the time of the primary election to be held in 2024, and every twelfth year thereafter, two justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals. Effective with the primary election held in the year 2016, the election of justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals shall be on a nonpartisan basis and by division as set forth more fully in article five of this chapter.

(c) At the time of the primary election to be held in the year 2024, and every tenth year thereafter, there shall be elected one judge to a seat of the Intermediate Court of Appeals; at the time of the primary election to be held in 2026, and every tenth year thereafter, one judge to a seat of the Intermediate Court of Appeals; and at the time of the primary election to be held in 2028, and every tenth year thereafter, one judge to a seat of the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Effective with the primary election held in the year 2024, the election of Judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be on a nonpartisan basis and by division as set forth more fully in §3-5-1 et seq. of this code.

ARTICLE 4A. ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS.

§3-4A-11a. Ballots tabulated electronically; arrangement, quantity to be printed, ballot stub numbers.

(a) The board of ballot commissioners in counties using ballots upon which votes may be recorded by means of marking with electronically sensible ink or pencil and which marks are tabulated electronically shall cause the ballots to be printed or displayed upon the screens of the electronic voting system for use in elections.

(b) (1) For the primary election, the heading of the ballot, the type faces, the names and arrangement of offices and the printing of names and arrangement of candidates within each office are to conform as nearly as possible to §3-5-13 and §3-5-13a of this code.

(2) For the general election, the heading of the ballot, the type faces, the names and arrangement of offices and the printing of names and the arrangement of candidates within each office are to conform as nearly as possible to §3-6-2 of this code.

(3) Effective with the primary election held in 2016 and thereafter, the following nonpartisan elections are to be separated from the partisan ballot and separately headed in display type with a title clearly identifying the purpose of the election and constituting a separate ballot wherever a separate ballot is required under this chapter:

(A) Nonpartisan elections for judicial offices, by division, of:

(i) Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals;

(ii) Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals;

(ii) (iii) Judge of the circuit court;

(iii) (iv) Family court judge; and

(iv) (v) Magistrate;

(B) Nonpartisan elections for Board of Education; and

(C) Any question to be voted upon.

(4) Beginning in the primary election to be held in the year 2020 and in each election thereafter, the nonpartisan judicial elections described in subparagraphs (i) through (iv), paragraph (A), subdivision (3), of this subsection shall appear immediately after the state ticket and shall immediately precede the county ticket, in the same manner prescribed in §3-5-13a of this code.

(5) Both the face and the reverse side of the ballot may contain the names of candidates only if means to ensure the secrecy of the ballot are provided and lines for the signatures of the poll clerks on the ballot are printed on a portion of the ballot which is deposited in the ballot box and upon which marks do not interfere with the proper tabulation of the votes.

(6) The arrangement of candidates within each office is to be determined in the same manner as for other electronic voting systems, as prescribed in this chapter. On the general election ballot for all offices, and on the primary election ballot only for those offices to be filled by election, except delegate to national convention, lines for entering write-in votes are to be provided below the names of candidates for each office, and the number of lines provided for any office shall equal the number of persons to be elected, or three, whichever is fewer. The words ‘WRITE-IN, IF ANY’ are to be printed, where applicable, directly under each line for write-ins. The lines are to be opposite a position to mark the vote.

(c) Except for electronic voting systems that utilize screens upon which votes may be recorded by means of a stylus or by means of touch, the primary election ballots are to be printed in the color of ink specified by the Secretary of State for the various political parties, and the general election ballot is to be printed in black ink. For electronic voting systems that utilize screens upon which votes may be recorded by means of a stylus or by means of touch, the primary ballots and the general election ballot are to be printed in black ink. All ballots are to be printed, where applicable, on white paper suitable for automatic tabulation and are to contain a perforated stub at the top or bottom of the ballot, which is to be numbered sequentially in the same manner as provided in §3-5-13 of this code, or are to be displayed on the screens of the electronic voting system upon which votes are recorded by means of a stylus or touch. The number of ballots printed and the packaging of ballots for the precincts are to conform to the requirements for paper ballots provided in this chapter.

(d) In addition to the official ballots, the ballot commissioners shall provide all other materials and equipment necessary to the proper conduct of the election.

ARTICLE 5. PRIMARY ELECTIONS AND NOMINATING PROCEDURES.

§3-5-6e. Election of Judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

(a) An election for the purpose of electing a Judge or Judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be held on the same date as the primary election, as provided by law, upon a nonpartisan ballot by division printed for this purpose. 

(b) In case of a tie vote under this section, §3-6-12 of this code controls in breaking the tie vote.

§3-5-7. Filing certificates of announcements of candidacies; requirements; withdrawal of candidates when section applicable.

(a) Any person who is eligible and seeks to hold an office or political party position to be filled by election in any primary or general election held under the provisions of this chapter shall file a certificate of announcement declaring his or her candidacy for the nomination or election to the office.

(b) The certificate of announcement shall be filed as follows:

(1) Candidates for the House of Delegates, the State Senate, circuit judge, family court judge, and any other office or political position to be filled by the voters of more than one county shall file a certificate of announcement with the Secretary of State.

(2) Candidates for an office or political position to be filled by the voters of a single county or a subdivision of a county, except for candidates for the House of Delegates, State Senate, circuit judge or family court judge, shall file a certificate of announcement with the clerk of the county commission.

(3) Candidates for an office to be filled by the voters of a municipality shall file a certificate of announcement with the recorder or city clerk.

(c) The certificate of announcement shall be filed with the proper officer not earlier than the second Monday in January before the primary election day and not later than the last Saturday in January before the primary election day and must be received before midnight, eastern standard time, of that day or, if mailed, shall be postmarked by the United States Postal Service before that hour. This includes the offices of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, circuit court judge, family court judge and magistrate, which are to be filled on a nonpartisan and division basis at the primary election:  Provided, That on the final day of a political filing period, the office of the Secretary of State shall be open from 9:00 a.m. until 11:59 p.m.  The offices of the County Clerk in all counties of the state shall be open on that final day of a political filing period from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m.

(d) The certificate of announcement shall be on a form prescribed by the Secretary of State on which the candidate shall make a sworn statement before a notary public or other officer authorized to administer oaths, containing the following information:

(1) The date of the election in which the candidate seeks to appear on the ballot;

(2) The name of the office sought; the district, if any; and the division, if any;

(3) The legal name of the candidate and the exact name the candidate desires to appear on the ballot, subject to limitations prescribed in §3-5-13 of this code;

(4) The county of residence and a statement that the candidate is a legally qualified voter of that county; and the magisterial district of residence for candidates elected from magisterial districts or under magisterial district limitations;

(5) The specific address designating the location at which the candidate resides at the time of filing, including number and street or rural route and box number and city, state, and zip code;

(6) For partisan elections, the name of the candidate’s political party and a statement that the candidate: (A) Is a member of and affiliated with that political party as evidenced by the candidate’s current registration as a voter affiliated with that party; and (B) has not been registered as a voter affiliated with any other political party for a period of sixty days before the date of filing the announcement;

(7) For candidates for delegate to national convention, the name of the presidential candidate to be listed on the ballot as the preference of the candidate on the first convention ballot; or a statement that the candidate prefers to remain “uncommitted”;

(8) A statement that the person filing the certificate of announcement is a candidate for the office in good faith;

(9) The words ‘subscribed and sworn to before me this ______ day of _____________, 20____’ and a space for the signature of the officer giving the oath.

(e) The Secretary of State or the board of ballot commissioners, as the case may be, may refuse to certify the candidacy or may remove the certification of the candidacy upon receipt of a certified copy of the voter’s registration record of the candidate showing that the candidate was registered as a voter in a party other than the one named in the certificate of announcement during the sixty days immediately preceding the filing of the certificate: Provided, That unless a signed formal complaint of violation of this section and the certified copy of the voter’s registration record of the candidate are filed with the officer receiving that candidate’s certificate of announcement no later than ten days following the close of the filing period, the candidate may not be refused certification for this reason.

(f) The certificate of announcement shall be subscribed and sworn to by the candidate before some officer qualified to administer oaths, who shall certify the same. Any person who knowingly provides false information on the certificate is guilty of false swearing and shall be punished in accordance with §3-9-3 of this code.

(g) Any candidate for delegate to a national convention may change his or her statement of presidential preference by notifying the Secretary of State by letter received by the Secretary of State no later than the third Tuesday following the close of candidate filing. When the rules of the political party allow each presidential candidate to approve or reject candidates for delegate to convention who may appear on the ballot as committed to that presidential candidate, the presidential candidate or the candidate’s committee on his or her behalf may file a list of approved or rejected candidates for delegate and the Secretary of State shall list as “uncommitted” any candidate for delegate who is disapproved by the presidential candidate.

(h) A person may not be a candidate for more than one office or office division at any election: Provided, That a candidate for an office may also be a candidate for President of the United States, for membership on political party executive committees or for delegate to a political party national convention: Provided, however, That an unsuccessful candidate for a nonpartisan office in an election held concurrently with the primary election may be appointed under the provisions of section nineteen of this article to fill a vacancy on the general ballot.

(i) A candidate who files a certificate of announcement for more than one office or division and does not withdraw, as provided by §3-5-11 of this code, from all but one office prior to the close of the filing period may not be certified by the Secretary of State or placed on the ballot for any office by the board of ballot commissioners.

§3-5-13. Form and contents of ballots.

The following provisions apply to the form and contents of election ballots:

(1) The face of every primary election ballot shall conform as nearly as practicable to that used at the general election.

(2) The heading of every ballot is to be printed in display type. The heading is to contain a ballot title, the name of the county, the state, the words ‘Primary Election’ and the month, day and year of the election. The ballot title of the political party ballots is to contain the words “Official Ballot of the (Name) Party’ and the official symbol of the political party may be included in the heading.

(A) The ballot title of any separate paper ballot or portion of any electronic or voting machine ballot for all judicial officers shall commence with the words “Nonpartisan Ballot of Election of Judicial Officers’ and each such office shall be listed in the following order:

(i) The ballot title of any separate paper ballot or portion of any electronic or voting machine ballot for all justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals shall contain the words ‘Nonpartisan Ballot of Election of Justice(s) of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia’. The names of the candidates for the Supreme Court of Appeals shall be printed by division without references to political party affiliation or registration.

(ii) The ballot title of any separate paper ballot or portion of any electronic or voting machine ballot for all judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall contain the words ‘Nonpartisan Ballot of Election of Judge(s) of the Intermediate Court of Appeals’. The names of the candidates for the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be printed by division without references to political party affiliation or registration.

(iii) The ballot title of any separate paper ballot or portion of any electronic or voting machine ballot for all circuit court judges in the respective circuits shall contain the words ‘Nonpartisan Ballot of Election of Circuit Court Judge(s)’. The names of the candidates for the respective circuit court judge office shall be printed by division without references to political party affiliation or registration.

(iii) (iv) The ballot title of any separate paper ballot or portion of any electronic or voting machine ballot for all family court judges in the respective circuits shall contain the words “Nonpartisan Ballot of Election of Family Court Judge(s)’. The names of the candidates for the respective family court judge office shall be printed by division without references to political party affiliation or registration.

(iv) (v) The ballot title of any separate paper ballot or portion of any electronic or voting machine ballot for all magistrates in the respective circuits shall contain the words “Nonpartisan Ballot of Election of Magistrate(s)’. The names of the candidates for the respective magistrate office shall be printed by division without references to political party affiliation or registration.

(B) The ballot title of any separate paper ballot or portion of any electronic or voting machine ballot for the Board of Education is to contain the words “Nonpartisan Ballot of Election of Members of the ______________ County Board of Education’. The districts for which fewer than two candidates may be elected and the number of available seats are to be specified and the names of the candidates are to be printed without reference to political party affiliation and without designation as to a particular term of office.

(C) Any other ballot or portion of a ballot on a question is to have a heading which clearly states the purpose of the election according to the statutory requirements for that question.

(3) (A) For paper ballots, the heading of the ballot is to be separated from the rest of the ballot by heavy lines and the offices shall be arranged in columns with the following headings, from left to right across the ballot: “National Ticket’, ‘State Ticket’, ‘Nonpartisan Judicial Ballot’, ‘County Ticket’, ‘Nonpartisan Ballot’ in a nonpresidential election year, ‘District Ticket’ or, in a presidential election year, ‘National Convention’. The columns are to be separated by heavy lines. Within the columns, the offices are to be arranged in the order prescribed in §3-5-13a of this code.

(B) For voting machines, electronic voting devices and any ballot tabulated by electronic means, the offices are to appear in the same sequence as prescribed in §3-5-13a of this code and under the same headings as prescribed in paragraph (A) of this subdivision. The number of pages, columns or rows, where applicable, may be modified to meet the limitations of ballot size and composition requirements subject to approval by the Secretary of State.

(C) The title of each office is to be separated from preceding offices or candidates by a line and is to be printed in bold type no smaller than eight point. Below the office is to be printed the number of the district, if any, the number of the division, if any, and the words ‘Vote for ________’ with the number to be nominated or elected or ‘Vote For Not More Than ________’ in multicandidate elections. For offices in which there are limitations relating to the number of candidates which may be nominated, elected or appointed to or hold office at one time from a political subdivision within the district or county in which they are elected, there is to be a clear explanation of the limitation, as prescribed by the Secretary of State, printed in bold type immediately preceding the names of the candidates for those offices on the ballot in every voting system. For counties in which the number of county commissioners exceeds three and the total number of members of the county commission is equal to the number of magisterial districts within the county, the office of county commission is to be listed separately for each district to be filled with the name of the magisterial district and the words ‘Vote for One’ printed below the name of the office: Provided, That the office title and applicable instructions may span the width of the ballot so as it is centered among the respective columns.

(D) The location for indicating the voter’s choices on the ballot is to be clearly shown. For paper ballots, other than those tabulated electronically, the official primary ballot is to contain a square formed in dark lines at the left of each name on the ballot, arranged in a perpendicular column of squares before each column of names.

(4) (A) The name of every candidate certified by the Secretary of State or the board of ballot commissioners is to be printed in capital letters in no smaller than eight point type on the ballot for the appropriate precincts. Subject to the rules promulgated by the Secretary of State, the name of each candidate is to appear in the form set out by the candidate on the certificate of announcement, but in no case may the name misrepresent the identity of the candidate nor may the name include any title, position, rank, degree or nickname implying or inferring any status as a member of a class or group or affiliation with any system of belief.

(B) The city of residence of every candidate, the state of residence of every candidate residing outside the state, the county of residence of every candidate for an office on the ballot in more than one county and the magisterial district of residence of every candidate for an office subject to magisterial district limitations are to be printed in lower case letters beneath the names of the candidates.

(C) The arrangement of names within each office must be determined as prescribed in §3-5-13a of this code.

(D) If the number of candidates for an office exceeds the space available on a column or ballot page and requires that candidates for a single office be separated, to the extent possible, the number of candidates for the office on separate columns or pages are to be nearly equal and clear instructions given the voter that the candidates for the office are continued on the following column or page.

(5) When an insufficient number of candidates has filed for a party to make the number of nominations allowed for the office or for the voters to elect sufficient members to the Board of Education or to executive committees, the vacant positions on the ballot shall be filled with the words ‘No Candidate Filed’: Provided, That in paper ballot systems which allow for write-ins to be made directly on the ballot, a blank line shall be placed in any vacant position in the office of Board of Education or for election to any party executive committee. A line shall separate each candidate from every other candidate for the same office. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, if there are multiple vacant positions on a ballot for one office, the multiple vacant positions which would otherwise be filled with the words ‘No Candidate Filed’ may be replaced with a brief detailed description, approved by the Secretary of State, indicating that there are no candidates listed for the vacant positions.

(6) In presidential election years, the words ‘For election in accordance with the plan adopted by the party and filed with the Secretary of State’ is to be printed following the names of all candidates for delegate to national convention.

(7) All paper ballots are to be printed in black ink on paper sufficiently thick so that the printing or marking cannot be discernible from the back: Provided, That no paper ballot voted pursuant to the provisions of 42 U. S. C. §1973, et seq., the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act of 1986, or federal write-in absentee ballot may be rejected due to paper type, envelope type, or notarization requirement. Ballot cards and paper for printing ballots using electronically sensible ink are to meet minimum requirements of the tabulating systems and are to conform in size and weight to ensure ease in tabulation.

(8) Ballots are to contain perforated tabs at the top of the ballots and are to be printed with unique sequential numbers from one to the highest number representing the total number of ballots printed. On paper ballots, the ballot is to be bordered by a solid line at least one sixteenth of an inch wide and the ballot is to be trimmed to within one-half inch of that border.

(9) On the back of every official ballot or ballot card the words ‘Official Ballot’ with the name of the county and the date of the election are to be printed. Beneath the date of the election there are to be two blank lines followed by the words ‘Poll Clerks’.

(10) The face of sample paper ballots and sample ballot labels are to be like other official ballots or ballot labels except that the word ‘sample’ is to be prominently printed across the front of the ballot in a manner that ensures the names of candidates are not obscured and the word ‘sample’ may be printed in red ink. No printing may be placed on the back of the sample.

ARTICLE 10. FILLING VACANCIES.

§3-10-3. Vacancies in offices of state officials, justices, judges, and magistrates.

(a) Any vacancy occurring in the offices of Secretary of State, Auditor, Treasurer, Attorney General, Commissioner of Agriculture, or in any office created or made elective to be filled by the voters of the entire state, is filled by the Governor of the state by appointment and subsequent election to fill the remainder of the term, if required by §3‑10‑1 of this code. The Governor shall make the appointment from a list of three legally qualified persons submitted by the party executive committee of the same political party with which the person holding the office immediately preceding the vacancy was affiliated at the time the vacancy occurred. The list of qualified persons to fill the vacancy shall be submitted to the Governor within 15 days after the vacancy occurs, and the Governor shall duly make his or her appointment to fill the vacancy from the list of legally qualified persons within five days after the list is received. If the list is not submitted to the Governor within the 15‑day period, the Governor shall appoint, within five days thereafter, a legally qualified person of the same political party with which the person holding the office immediately preceding the vacancy was affiliated at the time the vacancy occurred: Provided, That the provisions of this subsection do not apply to §3‑10‑3(b), §3‑10‑3(c), §3‑10‑3(d), and §3‑10‑3(e) of this code.

(b) Any vacancy occurring in the offices of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, judge of a circuit court, or judge of a family court is filled by the Governor of the state by appointment and, if the unexpired term be for a period of more than two years, by a subsequent election to fill the remainder of the term, as required by §3‑10‑3(d) of this code. If an election is required under §3‑10‑3(d) of this code, the Governor, circuit court, or the chief judge thereof in vacation, is responsible for the proper proclamation by order and notice required by §3‑10‑1 of this code.

(c) Any vacancy in the office of magistrate is appointed according to the provisions of §50‑1‑6 of this code, and, if the unexpired term be for a period of more than two years, by a subsequent election to fill the remainder of the term, as required by §3‑10‑3(d) of this code.

(d) (1) When the vacancy in the office of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, judge of the circuit court, judge of a family court, or magistrate occurs after the 84th day before a general election, and the affected term of office ends on December 31 following the succeeding general election two years later, the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall continue in office until the completion of the term.

(2) When the vacancy occurs before the close of the candidate filing period for the primary election, and if the unexpired term be for a period of greater than two years, the vacancy shall be filled by election in the nonpartisan judicial election held concurrently with the primary election and the appointment shall continue until a successor is elected and certified.

(3) When the vacancy occurs after the close of candidate filing for the primary election and not later than 84 days before the general election, and if the unexpired term be for a period of greater than two years, the vacancy shall be filled by election in a nonpartisan judicial election held concurrently with the general election, and the appointment shall continue until a successor is elected and certified.

(e) When an election to fill a vacancy is required to be held at the general election, according to the provisions of §3‑10‑3(d) of this code, a special candidate filing period shall be established. Candidates seeking election to any unexpired term for Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, judge of a circuit court, judge of the family court, or magistrate shall file a certificate of announcement and pay the filing fee no earlier than the first Monday in August and no later than 77 days before the general election.

§3-10-3a. Judicial Vacancy Advisory Commission.

(a) The Judicial Vacancy Advisory Commission shall assist the Governor in filling judicial vacancies. The commission shall meet and submit a list of no more than five nor less than two of the most qualified persons to the Governor within 90 days of the occurrence of a vacancy, or the formal announcement of the justice or judge by letter to the Governor of an upcoming resignation or retirement that will result in the occurrence of a vacancy, in the office of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, judge of a circuit court, or judge of a family court. The Governor shall make the appointment to fill the vacancy, as required by this article, within 30 days following the receipt of the list of qualified candidates or within 30 days following the vacancy, whichever occurs later.

(b) The commission shall consist of eight appointed members appointed by the Governor for six‑year terms, including four public members and four attorney members. The Governor shall appoint attorney members from a list of nominees provided by the Board of Governors of the West Virginia State Bar. The Board of Governors of the West Virginia State Bar shall nominate no more than 20 nor less than 10 of the most qualified attorneys for appointment to the commission whenever there is a vacancy in the membership of the commission reserved for attorney members. The commission shall choose one of its appointed members to serve as chair for a three‑year term. No more than four appointed members of the commission shall belong to the same political party. All members of the commission shall be citizens of this state. Public members of the commission may not be licensed to practice law in West Virginia or any other jurisdiction.

(c) (1) No more than two appointed members of the commission may be residents of the same state senatorial district, as provided in §1‑2‑1 of this code, at the time of appointment: Provided, That the members appointed to, and serving on, the commission prior to the enactment of this subdivision are not disqualified from service for the remainder of the member’s term based on the residency requirements of this subdivision.

(2) No more than three appointed members of the commission may be residents of the same congressional district: Provided, That, if the number of congressional districts in the state is reduced to two, then no more than four appointed members of the commission may be residents of the same congressional district: Provided, however, That the members appointed to, and serving on, the commission prior to the date on which the number of congressional districts in the state is reduced to two are not disqualified from service for the remainder of the member’s term based on the residency requirements of this subdivision.

 (d) The Governor, or his or her designee, the President of the West Virginia State Bar, and the Dean of the West Virginia University College of Law shall serve as ex officio members of the commission.

(e) Members of the commission shall serve without compensation, except that commission members are entitled to reimbursement of travel and other necessary expenses actually incurred while engaged in official commission activities in accordance with the guidelines of the Travel Management Office of the Department of Administration, or its successor entity. The Governor’s Office shall cooperate with the commission to ensure that all resources necessary to carrying out the official duties of the commission are provided, including staff assistance, equipment, and materials.

(f) The commission shall adopt written policies that formalize and standardize all operating procedures and ethical practices of its members, including, but not limited to, procedures for training commission members, publishing notice of judicial vacancies, recruiting qualified individuals for consideration by the commission, receiving applications from qualified individuals, notifying the public of judicial vacancies, notifying state or local groups and organizations of judicial vacancies, and soliciting public comment on judicial vacancies. The written policies of the commission are not subject to the provisions of chapter 29A of this code but shall be filed with the Secretary of State.

(g) A majority of the commission plus one shall constitute a quorum to do business.

(h) All organizational meetings of the commission shall be open to the public and subject to the requirements of §6‑9A‑1 et seq. of this code. An ‘organizational meeting’ means an initial meeting to discuss the commission’s procedures and requirements for a judicial vacancy. The commission shall hold at least one organizational meeting upon the occurrence of a judicial vacancy. All other meetings of the commission are exempt from §6‑9A‑1 et seq. of this code.

(i) The commission shall make available to the public copies of any applications and any letters of recommendation written on behalf of any applicants. All other documents or materials created or received by the commission shall be confidential and exempt from the provisions of chapter 29B of this code, except for the list of the most qualified persons or accompanying memoranda submitted to the Governor in accordance with the provisions of subsection (j) of this section, which shall be available for public inspection, and the written policies required to be filed with the Secretary of State in accordance with subsection (f) of this section.

(j) The commission shall submit its list of the most qualified persons to the Governor in alphabetical order. A memorandum may accompany the list of the most qualified persons and state facts concerning each of the persons listed. The commission shall make copies of any list of the most qualified persons and accompanying memoranda it submits to the Governor available for public inspection.

CHAPTER 6. GENERAL PROVISIONS RESPECTING OFFICERS.

ARTICLE 5. TERMS OF OFFICE; MATTERS AFFECTING THE RIGHT TO HOLD OFFICE.

§6-5-1. When terms of office to begin.

The terms of officers, except when elected or appointed to fill vacancies, shall begin respectively as follows: That of Governor, Secretary of State, State Superintendent of Free Schools, Treasurer, Auditor, Attorney General and Commissioner of Agriculture, on the first Monday after the second Wednesday of January next after their election; that of a member of the Legislature, on December 1, next after his or her election; and that of the justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals, the judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, the judges of the several circuit courts, the judges of the family and other inferior courts, the county commissioners, prosecuting attorneys, surveyors of land, assessors, sheriffs, clerks of the circuit, or other inferior courts, clerks of the county commissions, magistrates, on January 1, next after their election.

Whenever a person is elected or appointed to fill a vacancy, his or her term shall be as prescribed by chapter three of this code.

CHAPTER 16. PUBLIC HEALTH.

ARTICLE 2D. CERTIFICATE OF NEED.

§16-2D-16a. Transfer of appellate jurisdiction to Intermediate Court of Appeals.

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, effective July 1, 2022:

(1) The Office of Judges may not review a decision of the authority, issued after June 30, 2022, in a certificate of need review. On or before September 30, 2022, the Office of Judges shall issue a final decision in, or otherwise dispose of, each and every appeal, pending before the Office of Judges, of a decision by the authority in a certificate of need review.

(2) An appeal of a final decision in a certificate of need review, issued by the authority after June 30, 2022, shall be made to the West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals, pursuant to the provisions governing the judicial review of contested administrative cases in §29A‑5‑1 et seq. of this code.

(b) If the Office of Judges does not issue a final decision or otherwise dispose of any appeal of a decision of the authority in a certificate of need review on or before September 30, 2022, the appeal shall be transferred to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, as provided in §29A-5-4 of this code. For any appeal transferred pursuant to this subsection, the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall adopt any existing records of evidence and proceedings in the Office of Judges, conduct further proceedings as it considers necessary, and issue a final decision or otherwise dispose of the case pursuant to the provisions governing the judicial review of contested administrative cases in §29A‑5‑1 et seq. of this code.

CHAPTER 23. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION.

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.

§23-1-1h. Powers and duties of Office of Judges transferred to Board of Review; definition of certain terms effective July 1, 2022.

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, with regard to an objection, protest, or any other decision issued after June 30, 2022, all powers and duties of the Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges, as provided in this chapter, shall be transferred to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, the West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over the following matters:

(1) Decisions or orders issued by the Office of Judges after June 30, 2022, and prior to its termination; and

(2) Decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, issued after June 30, 2022, as provided in §23-5-8a and §51-11-1 et seq. of this code.

(c) Unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning, effective July 1, 2022, the following terms shall have the following meanings for the purposes of this chapter, except when used in §23-5-1 et seq. of this code:

(1) ‘Administrative law judge’ means a member of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, or a hearing examiner designated by the Board of Review as authorized in §23-5-1 et seq. of this code;

(2) ‘Office of judges’ means the ‘Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’; and

(3) ‘Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’ or ‘Board of Review’ when used in reference to an appeal of a Board of Review decision, means the West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals, created by §51-11-1 et seq. of this code.

ARTICLE 5. REVIEW.

§23-5-1. Notice by commission or self-insured employer of decision; procedures on claims; objections and hearing; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) The Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self-insured employers may determine all questions within their jurisdiction. In matters arising under §23-2C-8(c) of this code, and under §23-3-1 et seq. and §23-4-1 et seq. of this code, the Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self-insured employers shall promptly review and investigate all claims. The parties to a claim are the claimant and, if applicable, the claimant’s dependents, and the employer, and with respect to claims involving funds created in §23-2C-1 et seq. of this code for which he or she has been designated the administrator, the Insurance Commissioner. In claims in which the employer had coverage on the date of the injury or last exposure, the employer’s carrier has sole authority to act on the employer’s behalf in all aspects related to litigation of the claim. With regard to any issue which is ready for a decision, the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, shall promptly send the decision to all parties, including the basis of its decision. As soon as practicable after receipt of any occupational pneumoconiosis or occupational disease claim, or any injury claim in which temporary total benefits are being claimed, the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, shall send the claimant a brochure approved by the Insurance Commissioner setting forth the claims process.

(b) (1) Except with regard to interlocutory matters, upon making any decision, upon making or refusing to make any award, or upon making any modification or change with respect to former findings or orders, as provided by §23-4-16 of this code, the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, shall give notice, in writing, to the parties to the claim of its action. The notice shall state the time allowed for filing a protest to the finding. The action of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, is final unless the decision is protested within 60 days after the receipt of such decision unless a protest is filed within the 60-day period, the finding or action is final. This time limitation is a condition of the right to litigate the finding or action and hence jurisdictional. Any protest shall be filed with the Office of Judges with a copy served upon the parties to the claim, and other parties in accordance with the procedures set forth in §23-8-1 et seq. and §23-9-1 et seq. of this code. An employer may protest decisions incorporating findings made by the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board, decisions made by the Insurance Commissioner acting as administrator of claims involving funds created in §23-2C-1 et seq. of this code or decisions entered pursuant to §23-4-7A(c)(1) of this code.

(2) (A) With respect to every application for benefits filed on or after July 1, 2008, in which a decision to deny benefits is protested and the matter involves an issue as to whether the application was properly filed as a new claim or a reopening of a previous claim, the party that denied the application shall begin to make conditional payment of benefits and must promptly give notice to the Office of Judges that another identifiable person may be liable. The Office of Judges shall promptly order the appropriate persons be joined as parties to the proceeding: Provided, That at any time during a proceeding in which conditional payments are being made in accordance with the provisions of this subsection, the Office of Judges may, pending final determination of the person properly liable for payment of the claim, order that such conditional payments of benefits be paid by another party.

(B) Any conditional payment made pursuant to paragraph (A) of this subdivision shall not be deemed an admission or conclusive finding of liability of the person making such payments. When the administrative law judge has made a determination as to the party properly liable for payment of the claim, he or she shall direct any monetary adjustment or reimbursement between or among the Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self-insured employers as is necessary.

(c) The Office of Judges may direct that:

(1) An application for benefits be designated as a petition to reopen, effective as of the original date of filing;

(2) A petition to reopen be designated as an application for benefits, effective as of the original date of filing; or

(3) An application for benefits or petition to reopen filed with the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer be designated as an application or petition to reopen filed with another private carrier, self-insured employer, or Insurance Commissioner, effective as of the original date of filing.

(d) Where an employer protests a written decision entered pursuant to a finding of the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board, a decision on a claim made by the Insurance Commissioner acting as the administrator of a fund created in §23-2C-1 et seq. of this code, or decisions entered pursuant to §23-4-7A(c)(1) of this code, and the employer does not prevail in its protest, and in the event the claimant is required to attend a hearing by subpoena or agreement of counsel, or at the express direction of the Office of Judges, then the claimant, in addition to reasonable traveling and other expenses, shall be reimbursed for loss of wages incurred by the claimant in attending the hearing.

(e) The Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, may amend, correct, or set aside any order or decision on any issue entered by it, which, at the time of issuance or any time after that, is discovered to be defective or clearly erroneous or the result of mistake, clerical error, or fraud, or with respect to any order or decision denying benefits, otherwise not supported by the evidence, but any protest filed prior to entry of the amended decision is a protest from the amended decision unless and until the administrative law judge before whom the matter is pending enters an order dismissing the protest as moot in light of the amendment. Jurisdiction to issue an amended decision pursuant to this subsection continues until the expiration of two years from the date of a decision to which the amendment is made unless the decision is sooner affected by an action of an administrative law judge or other judicial officer or body: Provided, That corrective actions in the case of fraud may be taken at any time.

(f) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-1a. Notice by commission or self‑insured employer of decision; procedures on claims; objections and hearing; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) The Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self‑insured employers may determine all questions within their jurisdiction. In matters arising under §23‑2C‑8(c), and under §23‑3‑1 et seq. and §23‑4‑1 et seq. of this code, the Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall promptly review and investigate all claims. The parties to a claim are the claimant and, if applicable, the claimant’s dependents, the employer, and, with respect to claims involving funds created in §23‑2C‑1 et seq. of this code for which he or she has been designated the administrator, the Insurance Commissioner. In claims in which the employer had coverage on the date of the injury or last exposure, the employer’s carrier has sole authority to act on the employer’s behalf in all aspects related to litigation of the claim. With regard to any issue which is ready for a decision, the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, shall promptly send the decision to all parties, including the basis of its decision. As soon as practicable after receipt of any occupational pneumoconiosis or occupational disease claim or any injury claim in which temporary total benefits are being claimed, the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, shall send the claimant a brochure approved by the Insurance Commissioner setting forth the claims process.

(b) (1) Except with regard to interlocutory matters, upon making any decision, upon making or refusing to make any award, or upon making any modification or change with respect to former findings or orders, as provided by §23‑4‑16 of this code, the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, shall give notice, in writing, to the parties to the claim of its action. The notice shall state the time allowed for filing an objection to the finding. The action of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, is final unless an objection to the decision is properly filed within 60 days after the receipt of such decision. This time limitation is a condition of the right to litigate the finding or action and hence jurisdictional. Any objection shall be filed with the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, as provided in §23‑5-8a and §23‑5-8b of this code, with a copy served upon the parties to the claim, and other parties in accordance with the procedures set forth in §23‑5‑8a and §23‑5‑9a of this code. An employer may file an objection to a decision incorporating findings made by the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board, decisions made by the Insurance Commissioner acting as administrator of claims involving funds created in §23‑2C‑1 et seq. of this code, or decisions entered pursuant to §23‑4‑7a(c)(1) of this code.

(2) (A) With respect to every application for benefits in which an objection to a decision to deny benefits is filed and the matter involves an issue as to whether the application was properly filed as a new claim or a reopening of a previous claim, the party that denied the application shall begin to make conditional payment of benefits and must promptly give notice to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review that another identifiable person may be liable. The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall promptly order the appropriate persons be joined as parties to the proceeding: Provided, That at any time during a proceeding in which conditional payments are being made in accordance with the provisions of this subsection, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review may, pending final determination of the person properly liable for payment of the claim, order that such conditional payments of benefits be paid by another party.

(B) Any conditional payment made pursuant to paragraph (A) of this subdivision shall not be deemed an admission or conclusive finding of liability of the person making such payments. When the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review has made a determination as to the party properly liable for payment of the claim, the Board of Review shall direct any monetary adjustment or reimbursement between or among the Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self‑insured employers as is necessary.

(c) The member of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review assigned to an objection, as provided in §23-5-9a(b) of this code, may direct that:

(1) An application for benefits be designated as a petition to reopen, effective as of the original date of filing;

(2) A petition to reopen be designated as an application for benefits, effective as of the original date of filing; or

(3) An application for benefits or petition to reopen filed with the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer be designated as an application or petition to reopen filed with another private carrier, self‑insured employer, or Insurance Commissioner, effective as of the original date of filing.

(d) Where an employer files an objection to a written decision entered pursuant to a finding of the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board, a decision on a claim made by the Insurance Commissioner acting as the administrator of a fund created in §23‑2C‑1 et seq. of this code, or decisions entered pursuant to §23‑4‑7a(c)(1) of this code, and the employer does not prevail in its objection, and in the event the claimant is required to attend a hearing by subpoena, or agreement of counsel, or at the express direction of Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, then the claimant, in addition to reasonable traveling and other expenses, shall be reimbursed for loss of wages incurred by the claimant in attending the hearing.

(e) The Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, may amend, correct, or set aside any order or decision on any issue entered by it which, at the time of issuance or any time after that, is discovered to be defective, or clearly erroneous, or the result of mistake, clerical error, or fraud, or with respect to any order or decision denying benefits, otherwise not supported by the evidence: Provided, That any objection filed prior to entry of the amended decision is an objection to the amended decision unless and until the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review enters an order dismissing the objection as moot in light of the amendment. Jurisdiction to issue an amended decision pursuant to this subsection continues until the expiration of two years from the date of a decision to which the amendment is made unless the decision is sooner affected by an action of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review or a judicial officer or body: Provided, however, That corrective actions in the case of fraud may be taken at any time.

(f) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-3. Refusal to reopen claim; notice; objection; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) If it appears to the Insurance Commissioner, private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, that an application filed under §23-2-1 et seq. of this code fails to disclose a progression or aggravation in the claimant’s condition, or some other fact or facts which were not previously considered in its former findings and which would entitle the claimant to greater benefits than the claimant has already received, the Insurance Commissioner, private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall, within a reasonable time, notify the claimant and the employer that the application fails to establish a prima facie cause for reopening the claim. The notice shall be in writing stating the reasons for denial and the time allowed for objection to the decision of the commission. The claimant may, within 60 days after receipt of the notice, object in writing to the finding. Unless the objection is filed within the 60-day period, no objection shall be allowed. This time limitation is a condition of the right to objection and hence jurisdictional. Upon receipt of an objection, the Office of Judges shall afford the claimant an evidentiary hearing as provided in §23-9-1 et seq. of this code.

(b) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-3a. Refusal to reopen claim; notice; objection; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) If it appears to the Insurance Commissioner, private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, that an application filed under §23‑5‑2a of this code fails to disclose a progression or aggravation in the claimant’s condition, or some other fact or facts which were not previously considered in its former findings, and which would entitle the claimant to greater benefits than the claimant has already received, the Insurance Commissioner, private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall, within a reasonable time, notify the claimant and the employer that the application fails to establish a prima facie cause for reopening the claim. The notice shall be in writing stating the reasons for denial and the time allowed for objection to the decision of the commission. The claimant may, within 60 days after receipt of the notice, object in writing to the finding. Unless the objection is filed within the 60‑day period, no objection shall be allowed. This time limitation is a condition of the right to objection and hence jurisdictional. Upon receipt of an objection, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall afford the claimant an evidentiary hearing as provided in §23‑5‑9a of this code.

(b) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-4. Application by employer for modification of award; objection to modification; hearing.

In any case in which an employer makes application in writing for a modification of any award previously made to an employee of the employer, the commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall make a decision upon the application. If the application discloses cause for a further adjustment, the commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall, after due notice to the employee, make the modifications or changes with respect to former findings or orders that are justified. Any party dissatisfied with any modification or change made or by the denial of an application for modification is, upon proper and timely objection, entitled to a hearing as provided in either section nine or nine-a of this article.

§23-5-5. Refusal of modification; notice; objection; effective until June 30, 2022.

If in any case it appears to the commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, that the application filed pursuant to §23-4-1 et seq. of this code fails to disclose some fact or facts which were not previously considered by the commission in its former findings, and which would entitle the employer to any modification of the previous award, the commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall, within 60 days from the receipt of the application, notify the claimant and employer that the application fails to establish a just cause for modification of the award. The notice shall be in writing stating the reasons for denial and the time allowed for objection to the decision of the commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable. The employer may, within 30 days after receipt of the notice, object in writing to the decision. Unless the objection is filed within the 30-day period, no objection shall be allowed. This time limitation is a condition of the right to objection and hence jurisdictional. Upon receipt of the objection, the office of judges shall afford the employer an evidentiary hearing as provided in §23-9-1 et seq. of this code.

(b) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-5a. Refusal of modification; notice; objection; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) If in any case it appears to the Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, that the application filed pursuant to §23‑5‑4 of this code fails to disclose some fact or facts which were not previously considered in former findings, and which would entitle the employer to any modification of the previous award, the Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall, within 60 days from the receipt of the application, notify the claimant and employer that the application fails to establish a just cause for modification of the award. The notice shall be in writing stating the reasons for denial and the time allowed for objection to the decision of the Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable. The employer may, within 30 days after receipt of the notice, object in writing to the decision. Unless the objection is filed within the 30-day period, no objection shall be allowed. This time limitation is a condition of the right to objection and hence jurisdictional. Upon receipt of the objection, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall afford the employer an evidentiary hearing as provided in §23‑5‑9 of this code.

(b) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-6. Time periods for objections and appeals; extensions; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) Notwithstanding the fact that the time periods set forth for objections, protests and appeals to or from the workers’ compensation Office of Judges are jurisdictional, the periods may be extended or excused upon application of either party within a period of time equal to the applicable period by requesting an extension of the time period showing good cause or excusable neglect, accompanied by the objection or appeal petition. In exercising discretion, the administrative law judge, appeal board, or court, as the case may be, shall consider whether the applicant was represented by counsel and whether timely and proper notice was actually received by the applicant or the applicant’s representative.

(b) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-6a. Time periods for objections and appeals; extensions; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) Notwithstanding the fact that the time periods set forth for objections, protests, and appeals to or from the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review are jurisdictional, the periods may be extended or excused upon application of either party within a period of time equal to the applicable period by requesting an extension of the time period showing good cause or excusable neglect, accompanied by the objection or appeal petition. In exercising discretion, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review or court, as the case may be, shall consider whether the applicant was represented by counsel and whether timely and proper notice was actually received by the applicant or the applicant’s representative.

(b) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-8. Designation of Office of Administrative Law Judges; powers of chief administrative law judge; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) The workers’ compensation office of administrative law judges previously created pursuant to chapter twelve, acts of the Legislature, 1990, second extraordinary session, is hereby continued and designated to be an integral part of the workers’ compensation system of this state. The Office of Judges shall be under the supervision of a chief administrative law judge who shall be appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(b) The chief administrative law judge shall be a person who has been admitted to the practice of law in this state and shall also have had at least four years of experience as an attorney. The chief administrative law judge’s salary shall be set by the workers’ compensation board of managers. The salary shall be within the salary range for comparable chief administrative law judges as determined by the state Personnel Board created by §29-6-6 of this code. The chief administrative law judge may only be removed by a vote of two-thirds of the members of the Workers’ Compensation Board of managers. Upon transfer of the Office of Judges to the Insurance Commissioner, the chief administrative law judge shall continue to serve as chief administrative law judge until December 31, 2007. Thereafter, appointments of the chief administrative law judge shall be for terms of four years beginning January 1, 2008, and the chief administrative law judge may be removed only for cause by the vote of four members of the Industrial Council. No other provision of this code purporting to limit the term of office of any appointed official or employee or affecting the removal of any appointed official or employee is applicable to the chief administrative law judge.

(c) The chief administrative law judge shall employ administrative law judges and other personnel that are necessary for the proper conduct of a system of administrative review of orders issued by the Workers’ Compensation Commission which orders have been objected to by a party. The employees shall be in the classified service of the state. Qualifications, compensation, and personnel practice relating to the employees of the office of judges, other than the chief administrative law judge, shall be governed by the provisions of this code and rules of the classified service pursuant to §29-6-1 of this code. All additional administrative law judges shall be persons who have been admitted to the practice of law in this state and shall also have had at least two years of experience as an attorney. The chief administrative law judge shall supervise the other administrative law judges and other personnel which collectively shall be referred to in this chapter as the Office of Judges.

(d) The administrative expense of the Office of Judges shall be included within the annual budget of the Workers’ Compensation Commission and, upon termination of the commission, the Insurance Commissioner.

(e) The Office of Judges shall, from time to time, promulgate rules of practice and procedure for the hearing and determination of all objections to findings or orders of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. The Office of Judges shall not have the power to initiate or to promulgate legislative rules as that phrase is defined in §29A-3-1 et seq. of this code. Any rules adopted pursuant to this section which are applicable to the provisions of this article are not subject to §29A-3-9 through §29A-3-16 of this code. The Office of Judges shall follow the remaining provisions of said chapter for giving notice to the public of its actions and the holding of hearings or receiving of comments on the rules.

(f) The chief administrative law judge has the power to hear and determine all disputed claims in accordance with the provisions of this article, establish a procedure for the hearing of disputed claims, take oaths, examine witnesses, issue subpoenas, establish the amount of witness fees, keep records, and make reports that are necessary for disputed claims and exercise any additional powers, including the delegation of powers to administrative law judges or hearing examiners that are necessary for the proper conduct of a system of administrative review of disputed claims. The chief administrative law judge shall make reports that are requested of him or her by the workers’ compensation board of managers.

(g) Effective upon termination of the commission, the Office of Judges and the Board of Review shall be transferred to the Insurance Commissioner, which shall have the oversight and administrative authority heretofore provided to the executive director and the board of managers.

(h) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-8a. Transfer of powers and duties of the Office of Administrative Law Judges to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review; powers of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review in relation to review of objections; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) The Workers’ Compensation Office of Administrative Law Judges, referred to as the Office of Judges, shall terminate on or before October 1, 2022, as provided in §23-5-8b of this code. All powers and duties of the Office of Judges to review objections, protests, or any other matter authorized by this chapter, shall be transferred to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review on July 1, 2022: Provided, That any objection or other matter filed pursuant to this chapter and pending before the Office of Judges upon its termination, in which a final decision has not been issued, shall also be transferred to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review as provided in §23-5-8b of this code.

 (b) Pursuant to §23‑5‑11a(n) of this code, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall employ hearing examiners and other personnel that are necessary for the proper conduct of a system of administrative review of objections to decisions of the Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, made pursuant to the provisions of §23‑5‑1a of this code and issued after June 30, 2022. All hearing examiners hired by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall be persons who have been admitted to the practice of law in this state and shall also have had at least four years of experience as an attorney. The chair of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall supervise hearing examiners and other personnel of the board, which collectively shall be referred to in this chapter as the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review.

 (c) The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review has the power to hear and determine all objections in accordance with the provisions of this article, establish a procedure for the hearing of objections, take oaths, examine witnesses, issue subpoenas, establish the amount of witness fees, keep records, and make reports that are necessary for reviewing objections, and exercise any additional powers, including the delegation of powers to hearing examiners that are necessary for the proper conduct of a system of administrative review of objections. The chair of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall make reports that are requested of him or her by the Insurance Commissioner.

 (d) Effective upon termination of the Office of Judges, the Insurance Commissioner shall have oversight and administrative authority over the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review as heretofore provided to the Insurance Commissioner over the Office of Judges.

(e) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-8b. Transfer of jurisdiction to review objections to Workers’ Compensation Board of Review; termination of Office of Judges; appeals of board decisions to Intermediate Court of Appeals; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) The Office of Judges has no jurisdiction to review objections to a decision of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, made pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and issued after June 30, 2022. The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review has exclusive jurisdiction to review objections to a decision of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, made pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and issued after June 30, 2022.

(b) On or before September 30, 2022, the Office of Judges shall issue a final decision in, or otherwise dispose of, each and every objection or other matter pending before the Office of Judges. If the Office of Judges does not issue a final decision or otherwise dispose of any objection or other matter pending before the Office of Judges on or before September 30, 2022, the objection or other matter shall be transferred to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. For any objections transferred from the Office of Judges to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, the Board of Review shall adopt any existing records of proceedings in the Office of Judges, conduct further proceedings, and collect evidence as it determines to be necessary, and issue a final decision or otherwise dispose of the case according to the procedural rules promulgated pursuant to §23-5-11a(m) of this code.

(c) Upon the Office of Judges’ disposition of every matter pending before the office, or on October 1, 2022, whichever occurs earlier, the Office of Judges is terminated.

(d) The West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals, created in §51‑11‑1 et seq. of this code, has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over the following:

(1) Decisions or orders issued by the Office of Judges after June 30, 2022, and prior to its termination; and

(2) All final orders or decisions issued by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review after June 30, 2022.

(e) Notwithstanding the requirements of this section, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall review and decide all remaining appeals filed with the Board of Review, of Office of Judges’ decisions issued prior to June 30, 2022, according to the procedure and requirements for such appeals heretofore provided in this article.

(f) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-9. Hearings on objections to Insurance Commissioner; private carrier or self-insured employer decisions; mediation; remand; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) Objections to a decision of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, made pursuant to the provisions of §23-5-1 et seq. of this code shall be filed with the Office of Judges. Upon receipt of an objection, the Office of Judges shall notify the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, and all other parties of the filing of the objection. The Office of Judges shall establish by rule promulgated in accordance with the provisions of §23-5-8(e) of this code an adjudicatory process that enables parties to present evidence in support of their positions and provides an expeditious resolution of the objection. The employer, the claimant, the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever are applicable, shall be notified of any hearing at least 10 days in advance. The Office of Judges shall review and amend, or modify, as necessary, its procedural rules by July 1, 2007.

(b) The Office of Judges shall establish a program for mediation to be conducted in accordance with the requirements of rule twenty-five of the West Virginia Trial Court Rules. The parties may agree that the result of the mediation is binding. A case may be referred to mediation by the administrative law judge on his or her own motion, on motion of a party or by agreement of the parties. Upon issuance of an order for mediation, the Office of Judges shall assign a mediator from a list of qualified mediators maintained by the West Virginia State Bar.

(c) The Office of Judges shall keep full and complete records of all proceedings concerning a disputed claim. Subject to the rules of practice and procedure promulgated pursuant to §23-5-8 of this code, the record upon which the matter shall be decided shall include any evidence submitted by a party to the Office of Judges and evidence taken at hearings conducted by the Office of Judges. The record may include evidence or documents submitted in electronic form or other appropriate medium in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure. The Office of Judges is not bound by the usual common law or statutory rules of evidence.

(d) All hearings shall be conducted as determined by the chief administrative law judge pursuant to the rules of practice and procedure promulgated pursuant to §23-5-8 of this code. Upon consideration of the designated record, the chief administrative law judge or other authorized adjudicator within the office of judges shall, based on the determination of the facts of the case and applicable law, render a decision affirming, reversing, or modifying the action protested. The decision shall contain findings of fact and conclusions of law and shall be mailed to all parties.

(e) The Office of Judges may remand a claim to the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, for further development of the facts or administrative matters as, in the opinion of the administrative law judge, may be necessary for a full and complete disposition of the case. The administrative law judge shall establish a time within which the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, must report back to the administrative law judge.

(f) The decision of the Office of Judges regarding any objections to a decision of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, is final and benefits shall be paid or denied in accordance with the decision, unless an order staying the payment of benefits is specifically entered by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review created in §23-5-11 of this code or by the administrative law judge who granted the benefits. No stay with respect to any medical treatment or rehabilitation authorized by the Office of Judges may be granted. If the decision is subsequently appealed and reversed in accordance with the procedures set forth in this article, and any overpayment of benefits occurs as a result of such reversal, any such overpayment may be recovered pursuant to the provisions of §23-4-1C(h) and §23-4-1D(d) of this code, as applicable.

(h) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-9a. Hearings on objections to Insurance Commissioner; private carrier, or self‑insured employer decisions; mediation; remand; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) Objections to a decision of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, made pursuant to the provisions of §23‑5‑1a of this code, shall be filed with the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Upon receipt of an objection, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall notify the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, and all other parties of the filing of the objection. The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall establish by rule, promulgated in accordance with the provisions of §23-5-11a(m) of this code, an adjudicatory process that enables parties to present evidence in support of their positions and provides an expeditious resolution of the objection. The employer, the claimant, the Insurance Commissioner, the private carrier, or the self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, shall be notified of any hearing at least 10 days in advance.

(b) The chair of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall assign, on a rotating basis, a member of the Board of Review to preside over the review process and issue a decision in each objection that is properly filed with the board of review. The member of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review assigned to an objection shall review evidence, conduct proceedings, and develop a record as is necessary for a full and thorough review of the objection: Provided, That the board member may delegate such duties to a hearing examiner employed by the board of review, pursuant to §23‑5‑8a and §23‑5‑11a(n) of this code: Provided, however, That any order or decision of the Board of Review must be issued and signed by the member of the Board assigned to the objection, as provided in subsection (e) of this section: Provided further, That a time frame order, continuance order, show cause order, failure to prosecute order, or other interlocutory order as permitted by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’s procedural rules may be issued and signed by a hearing examiner only, and is not subject to the general requirement that orders be issued and signed by a member of the board.

(c) The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall establish a program for mediation to be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Rule 25 of the West Virginia Trial Court Rules. The parties may agree that the result of the mediation is binding. A case may be referred to mediation by the Board of Review member assigned to the objection on his or her own motion, on motion of a party, or by agreement of the parties. Upon issuance of an order for mediation, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall assign a mediator from a list of qualified mediators maintained by the West Virginia State Bar.

 (d) The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall keep full and complete records of all proceedings concerning an objection. Subject to the rules of practice and procedure promulgated pursuant to §23-5-11a(m) of this code, the record upon which the matter shall be decided shall include any evidence submitted by a party to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review and evidence taken at hearings conducted by the Board of Review. The record may include evidence or documents submitted in electronic form or other appropriate medium in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure. The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review is not bound by the usual common law or statutory rules of evidence.

(e) All hearings shall be conducted as determined by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review according to the rules of practice and procedure promulgated pursuant to §23‑5‑11a(m) of this code. If a hearing examiner reviews an objection, the hearing examiner shall, at the conclusion of the review process, submit the designated record to the member of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review to whom the objection is assigned, along with the hearing examiner’s recommendation of a decision affirming, reversing, or modifying the action that was subject to the objection. Upon consideration of the designated record and, if applicable, the recommendation of the hearing examiner, the member of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review assigned to the objection shall, based on the determination of the facts of the case and applicable law, render a decision affirming, reversing, or modifying the action that was subject to the objection. The decision shall contain findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be signed by the member of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review rendering the decision, and shall be mailed to all parties.

(f) The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review may remand a claim to the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, for further development of the facts or administrative matters as, in the opinion of the member of the board of review assigned to the objection, may be necessary for a full and complete disposition of the case. The member of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review assigned to the objection shall establish a time within which the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, must report back to the board of review.

(g) The decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review regarding any objections to a decision of the Insurance Commissioner, private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, is final, and benefits shall be paid or denied in accordance with the decision, unless an order staying the payment of benefits is specifically entered by a court with appellate jurisdiction over the decision or by the member of the Office of Judges who granted the benefits. A stay with respect to any medical treatment or rehabilitation authorized by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review may not be granted. If the decision is subsequently appealed and reversed in accordance with the procedures set forth in this article, and any overpayment of benefits occurs as a result of the reversal, the overpayment may be recovered pursuant to the provisions of §23‑4‑1c(h) or §23‑4‑1d(d) of this code, as applicable.

(h) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-10. Appeal from administrative law judge decision to appeal board; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) The employer, claimant, Workers’ Compensation Commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, may appeal to the appeal board created in §23-11-1 et seq. of this code for a review of a decision by an administrative law judge. No appeal or review shall lie unless application therefor be made within thirty days of receipt of notice of the administrative law judge’s final action or in any event within sixty days of the date of such final action, regardless of notice and, unless the application for appeal or review is filed within the time specified, no such appeal or review shall be allowed, such time limitation being hereby declared to be a condition of the right of such appeal or review and hence jurisdictional.

(b) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-10a. Appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Board of Review decision to the Intermediate Court of Appeals; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) The employer, claimant, Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, may appeal to the West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals, created by §51‑11‑1 et seq. of this code, for a review of a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review.  No appeal or review shall lie unless application is made within 30 days of receipt of notice of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’s final action or in any event within 60 days of the date of such final action, regardless of notice and, unless the application for appeal or review is filed within the time specified, no such appeal or review shall be allowed, such time limitation being hereby declared to be a condition of the right of such appeal or review and hence jurisdictional.

(b) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-11. Workers’ Compensation Board of Review generally; administrative powers and duties of the board; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) On January 31, 2004, the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board heretofore established in this section is hereby abolished.

(b) There is created the ‘Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’, which may also be referred to as ‘the Board of Review’ or ‘the board’. Effective February 1, 2004, the board of Review shall exercise exclusive jurisdiction over all appeals from the Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges including any and all appeals pending with the board of Appeals on January 31, 2004.

(c) The board consists of three members.

(d) The Governor shall appoint, from names submitted by the ‘Workers’ Compensation Board of Review Nominating Committee’, with the advice and consent of the Senate, three qualified attorneys to serve as members of the Board of Review. If the Governor does not select a nominee for any vacant position from the names provided by the nominating committee, he or she shall notify the nominating committee of that circumstance and the committee shall provide additional names for consideration by the Governor. A member of the Board of Review may be removed by the Governor for official misconduct, incompetence, neglect of duty, gross immorality, or malfeasance, and then only after notice and opportunity to respond and present evidence. No more than two of the members of the board may be of the same political party. The members of the Board of Review shall be paid an annual salary of $85,000: Provided, That on and after July 1, 2008, the Governor shall set the salary of the members of the board: Provided, however, That the annual salary of a member of the Board of Review shall not exceed $110,000. Members are entitled to be reimbursed for actual and necessary travel expenses incurred in the discharge of official duties in a manner consistent with the guidelines of the Travel Management Office of the Department of Administration.

(e) The nominating committee consists of the following members: (1) The President of the West Virginia State Bar who serves as the chairperson of the committee; (2) an active member of the West Virginia State Bar Workers’ Compensation Committee selected by the major trade association representing employers in this state; (3) an active member of the West Virginia State Bar Workers’ Compensation Committee selected by the highest ranking officer of the major employee organization representing workers in this state; (4) the Dean of the West Virginia University School of Law; and (5) the Chairman of the Judicial Investigation Committee.

(f) The nominating committee is responsible for reviewing and evaluating candidates for possible appointment to the Board of Review by the Governor. In reviewing candidates, the nominating committee may accept comments from and request information from any person or source.

(g) Each member of the nominating committee may submit up to three names of qualified candidates for each position on the Board of Review: Provided, That the member of the nominating committee selected by the major trade organization representing employers of this state shall submit at least one name of a qualified candidate for each position on the board who either is, or who represents, small business employers of this state. After careful review of the candidates, the committee shall select a minimum of one candidate for each position on the board.

(h) Of the initial appointments, one member shall be appointed for a term ending December 31, 2006; one member shall be appointed for a term ending December 31, 2008; and one member shall be appointed for a term ending December 31, 2010. Thereafter, the appointments shall be for six-year terms.

(i) A member of the Board of Review must, at the time he or she takes office and thereafter during his or her continuance in office, be a resident of this state, be a member in good standing of the West Virginia State Bar, have a minimum of 10 years’ experience as an attorney admitted to practice law in this state prior to appointment and have a minimum of five years’ experience in preparing and presenting cases or hearing actions and making decisions on the basis of the record of those hearings before administrative agencies, regulatory bodies, or courts of record at the federal, state, or local level.

(j) No member of the Board of Review may hold any other office, or accept any appointment or public trust, nor may he or she become a candidate for any elective public office or nomination thereto. Violation of this subsection requires the member to vacate his or her office. No member of the Board of Review may engage in the practice of law during his or her term of office.

(k) A vacancy occurring on the board other than by expiration of a term shall be filled in the manner original appointments were made, for the unexpired portion of the term.

(l) The board shall designate one of its members in rotation to be chairman of the board for as long as the board may determine by order made and entered of record. In the absence of the chairman, any other member designated by the members present shall act as chairman.

(m) The Board of Review shall meet as often as necessary to hold review hearings, at such times and places as the chairman may determine. Two members shall be present in order to conduct review hearings or other business. All decisions of the board shall be determined by a majority of the members of the board.

(n) The Board of Review shall make general rules regarding the pleading, including the form of the petition and any responsive pleadings, practice, and procedure to be used by the board.

(o) The Board of Review may hire a clerk and other professional and clerical staff necessary to carry out the requirements of this article. It is the duty of the clerk of the Board of Review to attend in person, or by deputy, all the sessions of the board, to obey its orders and directions, to take care of and preserve in an office, kept for the purpose, all records and papers of the board, and to perform other duties as prescribed by law or required of him or her by the board. All employees of the board serve at the will and pleasure of the board. The board’s employees are exempt from the salary schedule or pay plan adopted by the Division of Personnel. All personnel of the Board of Review are under the supervision of the chairman of the Board of Review.

(p) If considered necessary by the board, the board may, through staffing or other resources, procure assistance in review of medical portions of decisions.

(q) Upon the conclusion of any hearing, or prior thereto with concurrence of the parties, the board shall promptly determine the matter and make an award in accordance with its determination.

(r) The award shall become a part of the commission file. A copy of the award shall be sent forthwith by mail to all parties in interest.

(s) The award is final when entered. The award shall contain a statement explaining the rights of the parties to an appeal to the Board of Review and the applicable time limitations involved.

(t) The board shall submit to the Insurance Commissioner a budget sufficient to adequately provide for the administrative and other operating expenses of the board.

(u) The board shall report monthly to the Industrial Council on the status of all claims on appeal.

(v) Effective upon termination of the commission, the Board of Review shall be transferred to the Insurance Commissioner which shall have the oversight and administrative authority heretofore provided to the executive director and the board of managers.

(w) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23‑5‑11a. Workers’ Compensation Board of Review generally; administrative powers and duties of the board; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) The ‘Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’, which may also be referred to as ‘the Board of Review’ or ‘the board’ is hereby continued and granted exclusive jurisdiction over all objections to decisions of the Insurance Commissioner, private carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, including any and all matters pending before the Office of Judges after September 30, 2022.

(b) The board consists of five members.

(c) The Governor shall appoint, with the advice and consent of the Senate, five attorneys qualified in accordance with subsection (f) of this section to serve as members of the Board of Review. A member of the Board of Review may be removed by the Governor for official misconduct, incompetence, neglect of duty, gross immorality, or malfeasance and then only after notice and opportunity to respond and present evidence. No more than three of the members of the board may be of the same political party. The Governor shall set the salary of the members of the board: Provided, however, That the annual salary of a member of the Board of Review shall not exceed $125,000. Members are entitled to be reimbursed for actual and necessary travel expenses incurred in the discharge of official duties in a manner consistent with the guidelines of the Travel Management Office of the Department of Administration.

(d) Of the initial appointments of the two additional seats created during the 2021 Regular Session, one member shall be appointed for a term ending December 31, 2025; one member shall be appointed for a term ending December 31, 2027. Thereafter, The appointments shall be for six-year terms.

(e) A member of the Board of Review must, at the time he or she takes office and thereafter during his or her continuance in office, be a resident of this state, be a member in good standing of the West Virginia State Bar, have a minimum of 10 years’ experience as an attorney admitted to practice law in this state prior to appointment and have a minimum of five years’ experience in preparing and presenting cases or hearing actions and making decisions on the basis of the record of those hearings before administrative agencies, regulatory bodies or courts of record at the federal, state or local level.

 (f) No member of the Board of Review may hold any other office, or accept any appointment or public trust, nor may he or she become a candidate for any elective public office or nomination thereto. Violation of this subsection requires the member to vacate his or her office. No member of the Board of Review may engage in the practice of law during his or her term of office.

 (g) A vacancy occurring on the board other than by expiration of a term shall be filled in the manner original appointments were made, for the unexpired portion of the term.

 (h) The board shall designate one of its members in rotation to be chair of the board for as long as the board may determine by order made and entered of record. In the absence of the chair, any other member designated by the members present shall act as chair.

(i) The Board of Review shall meet as often as necessary to conduct the board’s administrative business and make rules of practice and procedure, at such times and places as the chair may determine. Two members shall be present in order to conduct administrative business and make rules of practice and procedure. All decisions of the board upon administrative matters, pursuant to this section, shall be determined by a majority of the members of the board.

(j) The Board of Review shall, from time to time, promulgate rules of practice and procedure for the review and determination of all objections filed with the board. The board does not have the power to initiate or to promulgate legislative rules as that phrase is defined in §29A-3-1 et seq. of this code. Any rules adopted pursuant to this section which are applicable to the provisions of this article are not subject to §29A-3-9 through §29A-3-16 of this code. The board shall follow the remaining provisions of chapter 29A of this code for giving notice to the public of its actions and the holding of hearings or receiving of comments on the rules.

 (k) The Board of Review may hire a clerk, hearing examiners, and other professional and clerical staff necessary to carry out the requirements of this article. It is the duty of the clerk of the Board of Review to attend in person, or by deputy, all the sessions of the board, to obey its orders and directions, to take care of and preserve in an office, kept for the purpose, all records and papers of the board and to perform other duties as prescribed by law or required of him or her by the board. All employees of the board serve at the will and pleasure of the board. The board’s employees are exempt from the salary schedule or pay plan adopted by the Division of Personnel: Provided, That for the purpose of any applicable Division of Personnel Class Specifications, hearing examiners must be classified under a class with ‘attorney’ in the class title. All personnel of the Board of Review are under the supervision of the chair of the Board of Review.

(l) The administrative expenses of the Board of Review shall be included within the annual budget of the Insurance Commissioner, and the Insurance Commissioner shall have administrative authority and oversight over the Board of Review.

(m) The amendments to this section made during the 2021 Regular Session of the Legislature shall become effective on July 1, 2022: Provided, That the board is authorized to promulgate rules and hire staff, pursuant to subsection (k) and (l) of this section respectively, prior to July 1, 2022, to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of this article that shall become effective on that date.

§23-5-12. Appeal to board; procedure; remand and supplemental hearing; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) Any employer, employee, claimant, or dependent who shall feel aggrieved at any final action of the administrative law judge taken after a hearing held in accordance with the provisions of §23-5-9 of this code shall have the right to appeal to the board created in §23-11-1 of this code for a review of such action. The Workers’ Compensation Commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall likewise have the right to appeal to the board any final action taken by the administrative law judge. The aggrieved party shall file a written notice of appeal with the board of review, with a copy to the office of judges, within thirty days after receipt of notice of the action complained of or, in any event, regardless of notice, within sixty days after the date of the action complained of, and unless the notice of appeal is filed within the time specified, no appeal shall be allowed, the time limitation is a condition of the right to appeal and hence jurisdictional. The board shall notify the other parties immediately upon the filing of a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal shall state the ground for review and whether oral argument is requested. The Office of Judges, after receiving a copy of the notice of appeal, shall forthwith make up a transcript of the proceedings before the Office of Judges and certify and transmit it to the board. The certificate shall incorporate a brief recital of the proceedings in the case and recite each order entered and the date thereof.

(b) The board shall set a time and place for the hearing of arguments on each claim and shall notify the interested parties thereof. The review by the board shall be based upon the record submitted to it and such oral argument as may be requested and received. The board may affirm, reverse, modify, or supplement the decision of the administrative law judge and make such disposition of the case as it determines to be appropriate. Briefs may be filed by the interested parties in accordance with the rules of procedure prescribed by the board. The board may affirm the order or decision of the administrative law judge or remand the case for further proceedings. It shall reverse, vacate, or modify the order or decision of the administrative law judge if the substantial rights of the petitioner or petitioners have been prejudiced because the administrative law judge’s findings are:

(1) In violation of statutory provisions; or

(2) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the administrative law judge; or

(3) Made upon unlawful procedures; or

(4) Affected by other error of law; or

(5) Clearly wrong in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record; or

(6) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.

(c) After a review of the case, the board shall issue a written decision and send a copy by mail to the parties.

(1) All decisions, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Board of Review shall be in writing and state with specificity the laws and facts relied upon to sustain, reverse, or modify the administrative law judge’s decision.

(2) Decisions of the Board of Review shall be made by a majority vote of the board of review.

(3) A decision of the Board of Review is binding upon the executive director and the commission and the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, with respect to the parties involved in the particular appeal. The executive director, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall have the right to seek judicial review of a board of review decision irrespective of whether or not he or she appeared or participated in the appeal to the Board of Review.

(d) Instead of affirming, reversing, or modifying the decision of the administrative law judge, the board may, upon motion of any party or upon its own motion, for good cause shown, to be set forth in the order of the board, remand the case to the chief administrative law judge for the taking of such new, additional, or further evidence as in the opinion of the board may be necessary for a full and complete development of the facts of the case. In the event the board shall remand the case to the chief administrative law judge for the taking of further evidence, the administrative law judge shall proceed to take new, additional, or further evidence in accordance with any instruction given by the board within 30 days after receipt of the order remanding the case. The chief administrative law judge shall give to the interested parties at least 10 days’ written notice of the supplemental hearing, unless the taking of evidence is postponed by agreement of parties, or by the administrative law judge for good cause. After the completion of a supplemental hearing, the administrative law judge shall, within 60 days, render his or her decision affirming, reversing, or modifying the former action of the administrative law judge. The decision shall be appealable to and proceeded with by the Board of Review in the same manner as other appeals. In addition, upon a finding of good cause, the board may remand the case to the Workers’ Compensation Commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, for further development. Any decision made by the commission, the successor to the commission, other private insurance carriers, and self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, following a remand shall be subject to objection to the Office of Judges and not to the board. The board may remand any case as often as in its opinion is necessary for a full development and just decision of the case.

(e) All appeals from the action of the administrative law judge shall be decided by the board at the same session at which they are heard, unless good cause for delay thereof be shown and entered of record.

(f) In all proceedings before the board, any party may be represented by counsel.

(g) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-12a. Appeal of board decisions to the Intermediate Court of Appeals; procedure; remand and supplemental hearing; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) Any employer, employee, claimant, or dependent who shall feel aggrieved by a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall have the right to appeal to the West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals, created by §51‑11‑1 et seq. of this code, for a review of such action. The Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall likewise have the right to appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals any final action taken by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. The aggrieved party shall file a written notice of appeal with the Intermediate Court of Appeals, with a copy to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, within 30 days after receipt of notice of the action complained of or, in any event, regardless of notice, within 60 days after the date of the action complained of: Provided, That unless the notice of appeal is filed within the time specified, no appeal shall be allowed: Provided, however, That the time limitation is a condition of the right to appeal and hence jurisdictional. The board shall notify the other parties immediately upon the filing of a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal shall state the grounds for review and whether oral argument is requested. The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, after receiving a copy of the notice of appeal, shall forthwith make up a transcript of any proceedings before the board of review and certify and transmit it to the Intermediate Court of Appeals. The certificate shall incorporate a brief recital of the proceedings in the matter and recite each order entered or decision issued and the date thereof.

(b) The Intermediate Court of Appeals shall set a time and place for the hearing of arguments on each claim and shall notify the interested parties thereof. The review by the court shall be based upon the record submitted to it and such oral argument as may be requested and received. The Intermediate Court of Appeals may affirm, reverse, modify, or supplement the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review and make such disposition of the case as it determines to be appropriate. Briefs may be filed by the interested parties in accordance with the rules of procedure prescribed by the court. The Intermediate Court of Appeals may affirm the order or decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review or remand the case for further proceedings. It shall reverse, vacate, or modify the order or decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, if the substantial rights of the petitioner or petitioners have been prejudiced because the Board of Review’s findings are:

(1) In violation of statutory provisions;

(2) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the Board of Review;

(3) Made upon unlawful procedures;

(4) Affected by other error of law;

(5) Clearly wrong in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record; or

(6) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.

(c) After a review of the case, the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall issue a written decision and send a copy by mail to the parties.

(1) All decisions, findings of fact, and conclusions of law of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be in writing and state with specificity the laws and facts relied upon to sustain, reverse, or modify the Board of Review’s decision.

(2) A decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals is binding upon the Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, with respect to the parties involved in the particular appeal. The Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, shall have the right to seek judicial review of a final decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, pursuant to §51‑11‑13 of this code, irrespective of whether the party appeared or participated in the appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

(d) Instead of affirming, reversing, or modifying the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, the Intermediate Court of Appeals may, upon motion of any party or upon its own motion, for good cause shown, to be set forth in the order of the court, remand the case to the Board of Review for the taking of such new, additional, or further evidence as in the opinion of the court considers necessary for a full and complete development of the facts of the case. In the event the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall remand the case to the Board of Review for the taking of further evidence, the Board of Review shall proceed to take new, additional, or further evidence in accordance with any instruction given by the court within 30 days after receipt of the order remanding the case. The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall give to the interested parties at least 10 days’ written notice of the supplemental hearing, unless the taking of evidence is postponed by agreement of parties, or by the Board of Review for good cause. After the completion of a supplemental hearing, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review shall, within 60 days, render its decision affirming, reversing, or modifying the former action of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review.  The decision shall be appealable to, and proceeded with, by the Intermediate Court of Appeals in the same manner as other appeals. In addition, upon a finding of good cause, the court may remand the case to the Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, or self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, for further development. Any decision made by the Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, or self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, following a remand, shall be subject to objection to the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review and not to the Intermediate Court of Appeals. The Intermediate Court of Appeals may remand any case as often as, in its opinion, is necessary for a full development and just decision of the case.

(e) In all proceedings before the Intermediate Court of Appeals, any party may be represented by counsel.

(f) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-13. Continuances and supplemental hearings; claims not to be denied on technicalities; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) It is the policy of this chapter that the rights of claimants for workers’ compensation be determined as speedily and expeditiously as possible to the end that those incapacitated by injuries and the dependents of deceased workers may receive benefits as quickly as possible in view of the severe economic hardships which immediately befall the families of injured or deceased workers. Therefore, the criteria for continuances and supplemental hearings ‘for good cause shown’ are to be strictly construed by the chief administrative law judge and his or her authorized representatives to prevent delay when granting or denying continuances and supplemental hearings. It is also the policy of this chapter to prohibit the denial of just claims of injured or deceased workers or their dependents on technicalities.

(b) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-13a. Continuances and supplemental hearings; claims not to be denied on technicalities; effective July 1, 2022.

(a) It is the policy of this chapter that the rights of claimants for workers’ compensation be determined as speedily and expeditiously as possible to the end that those incapacitated by injuries and the dependents of deceased workers may receive benefits as quickly as possible in view of the severe economic hardships which immediately befall the families of injured or deceased workers. Therefore, the criteria for continuances and supplemental hearings ‘for good cause shown’ are to be strictly construed by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review and its authorized representatives to prevent delay when granting or denying continuances and supplemental hearings. It is also the policy of this chapter to prohibit the denial of just claims of injured or deceased workers or their dependents on technicalities.

(b) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

§23-5-15. Appeals from final decisions of board to Supreme Court of Appeals prior to July 1, 2022; procedure; costs.

a) As provided in §23-5-8b of this code, the provisions of this section do not apply to any decision issued by the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review after June 30, 2022.

(a) (b) Review of any final decision of the board, including any order of remand, may be prosecuted by either party or by the Workers’ Compensation Commission, the successor to the commission Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, to the Supreme Court of Appeals within 30 days from the date of the final order by filing a petition therefor with the court against the board and the adverse party or parties as respondents. Unless the petition for review is filed within the 30-day period, no appeal or review shall be allowed, such time limitation is a condition of the right to such appeal or review and hence jurisdictional. The clerk of the Supreme Court of Appeals shall notify each of the respondents and the Workers’ Compensation Commission, the successor to the commission Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, of the filing of such petition. The board shall, within 10 days after receipt of the notice, file with the clerk of the court the record of the proceedings had before it, including all the evidence. The court or any judge thereof in vacation may thereupon determine whether or not a review shall be granted. If review is granted to a nonresident of this state, he or she shall be required to execute and file with the clerk before an order or review shall become effective, a bond, with security to be approved by the clerk, conditioned to perform any judgment which may be awarded against him or her. The board may certify to the court and request its decision of any question of law arising upon the record, and withhold its further proceeding in the case, pending the decision of court on the certified question, or until notice that the court has declined to docket the same. If a review is granted or the certified question is docketed for hearing, the clerk shall notify the board and the parties litigant or their attorneys and the Workers’ Compensation Commission, the successor to the commission Insurance Commissioner, other private insurance carriers, and self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, of that fact by mail. If a review is granted or the certified question docketed, the case shall be heard by the court in the same manner as in other cases, except that neither the record nor briefs need be printed. Every review granted or certified question docketed prior to 30 days before the beginning of the term, shall be placed upon the docket for that term. The Attorney General shall, without extra compensation, represent the board in such cases. The court shall determine the matter brought before it and certify its decision to the board and to the commission. The cost of the proceedings on petition, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, not exceeding $30 to the claimant’s attorney, shall be fixed by the court and taxed against the employer if the latter is unsuccessful. If the claimant, or the commission (in case the latter is the applicant for review) is unsuccessful, the costs, not including attorney’s fees, shall be taxed against the commission, payable out of the Workers’ Compensation Fund, or shall be taxed against the claimant, in the discretion of the court: But there shall be no cost taxed upon a certified question.

(b) (c) In reviewing a decision of the Board of Review, the Supreme Court of Appeals shall consider the record provided by the board and give deference to the board’s findings, reasoning, and conclusions, in accordance with subsections (c), and (d) and (e) of this section.

(c) (d) If the decision of the board represents an affirmation of a prior ruling by both the commission and the Office of Judges that was entered on the same issue in the same claim, the decision of the board may be reversed or modified by the Supreme Court of Appeals only if the decision is in clear violation of constitutional or statutory provision, is clearly the result of erroneous conclusions of law, or is based upon the board’s material misstatement or mischaracterization of particular components of the evidentiary record. The court may not conduct a de novo reweighing of the evidentiary record. If the court reverses or modifies a decision of the board pursuant to this subsection, it shall state with specificity the basis for the reversal or modification and the manner in which the decision of the board clearly violated constitutional or statutory provisions, resulted from erroneous conclusions of law, or was based upon the board’s material misstatement or mischaracterization of particular components of the evidentiary record.

(d) (e) If the decision of the board effectively represents a reversal of a prior ruling of either the commission or the Office of Judges that was entered on the same issue in the same claim, the decision of the board may be reversed or modified by the Supreme Court of Appeals only if the decision is in clear violation of constitutional or statutory provisions, is clearly the result of erroneous conclusions of law, or is so clearly wrong based upon the evidentiary record that even when all inferences are resolved in favor of the board’s findings, reasoning, and conclusions, there is insufficient support to sustain the decision. The court may not conduct a de novo reweighing of the evidentiary record. If the court reverses or modifies a decision of the board pursuant to this subsection, it shall state with specificity the basis for the reversal or modification and the manner in which the decision of the board clearly violated constitutional or statutory provisions, resulted from erroneous conclusions of law, or was so clearly wrong based upon the evidentiary record that even when all inferences are resolved in favor of the board’s findings, reasoning, and conclusions, there is insufficient support to sustain the decision.

§23-5-16. Fees of attorney for claimant; unlawful charging or receiving of attorney fees; effective until June 30, 2022.

(a) An attorney’s fee in excess of 20 percent of any award granted may not be charged or received by an attorney for a claimant or dependent. In no case may the fee received by the attorney of the claimant or dependent be in excess of 20 percent of the benefits to be paid during a period of 208 weeks. The interest on disability or dependent benefits as provided in this chapter may not be considered as part of the award in determining the attorney’s fee. However, any contract entered into in excess of 20 percent of the benefits to be paid during a period of 208 weeks, as herein provided, is unlawful and unenforceable as contrary to the public policy of this state and any fee charged or received by an attorney in violation thereof is an unlawful practice and renders the attorney subject to disciplinary action.

(b) On a final settlement an attorney may charge a fee not to exceed 20 percent of the total value of the medical and indemnity benefits: Provided, That this attorney’s fee, when combined with any fees previously charged or received by the attorney for permanent partial disability or permanent total disability benefits may not exceed 20 percent of an award of benefits to be paid during a period of 208 weeks.

(c) Except attorney’s fees and costs recoverable pursuant to §23-2C-21(c) of this code, an attorney’s fee for successful recovery of denied medical benefits may be charged or received by an attorney, and paid by the private carrier or self-insured employer, for a claimant or dependent under this section. In no event may attorney’s fees and costs be awarded pursuant to both this section and §23-2C-21(c) of this code.

(1) If a claimant successfully prevails in a proceeding relating to a denial of medical benefits brought before the commission, successor to the commission, other private carrier, or self-insured employer, whichever is applicable, as a result of utilization review, arbitration, mediation, or other proceedings, or a combination thereof, relating to denial of medical benefits before the Office of Judges, Board of Review, or court, there shall additionally be charged against the private carriers or self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, the reasonable costs and reasonable hourly attorney fees of the claimant. Following the successful resolution of the denial in favor of the claimant, a fee petition shall be submitted by the claimant’s attorney to the Insurance Commissioner or his or her successors, arbitrators, mediator, the Office of Judges, the Board of Review, or court, whichever enters a final decision on the issue. An attorney representing a claimant must submit a claim for attorney fees and costs within 30 days following a decision in which the claimant prevails and the order becomes final.

(2) The Insurance Commissioner or his or her successors, arbitrators, mediator, the Office of Judges, the Board of Review, or court shall enter an order within 30 days awarding reasonable attorney fees not to exceed $125 per hour and reasonable costs of the claimant to be paid by the private carriers or self-insured employers, whichever is applicable, which shall be paid as directed. In no event may an award of the claimant’s attorney’s fees under this subsection exceed $500 per litigated medical issue, not to exceed $2,500 in a claim.

(3) In determining the reasonableness of the attorney fees to be awarded, the Insurance Commission, arbitrator, mediator, Office of Judges, Board of Review, or court shall consider the experience of the attorney, the complexity of the issue, the hours expended, and the contingent nature of the fee.

(d) This section is of no force and effect after June 30, 2022.

§23-5-16a. Fees of attorney for claimant; unlawful charging or receiving of attorney fees.

(a) An attorney’s fee in excess of 20 percent of any award granted may not be charged or received by an attorney for a claimant or dependent. In no case may the fee received by the attorney of the claimant or dependent be in excess of 20 percent of the benefits, to be paid during a period of 208 weeks. The interest on disability or dependent benefits, as provided in this chapter, may not be considered as part of the award in determining the attorney’s fee. However, any contract entered into in excess of 20 percent of the benefits to be paid during a period of 208 weeks, as herein provided, is unlawful and unenforceable as contrary to the public policy of this state and any fee charged or received by an attorney in violation thereof is an unlawful practice and renders the attorney subject to disciplinary action.

(b) On a final settlement an attorney may charge a fee not to exceed 20 percent of the total value of the medical and indemnity benefits: Provided, That this attorney’s fee, when combined with any fees previously charged or received by the attorney for permanent partial disability or permanent total disability benefits may not exceed 20 percent of an award of benefits to be paid during a period of 208 weeks.

(c) Except attorney’s fees and costs recoverable pursuant to §23‑2C‑21(c) of this code, an attorney’s fee for successful recovery of denied medical benefits may be charged or received by an attorney and paid by the private carrier or self‑insured employer, for a claimant or dependent under this section. In no event may attorney’s fees and costs be awarded pursuant to both this section and §23‑2C‑21(c) of this code.

(1) If a claimant successfully prevails in a proceeding relating to a denial of medical benefits brought before the Insurance Commissioner, other private carrier, or self‑insured employer, whichever is applicable, as a result of utilization review, arbitration, mediation, or other proceedings, or a combination thereof, relating to denial of medical benefits before the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, or a court, there shall additionally be charged against the private carriers or self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, the reasonable costs and reasonable hourly attorney’s fees of the claimant. Following the successful resolution of the denial in favor of the claimant, a fee petition shall be submitted by the claimant’s attorney to the Insurance Commissioner or his or her successors, arbitrators, mediator, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, or a court, whichever enters a final decision on the issue. An attorney representing a claimant must submit a claim for attorney’s fees and costs within 30 days following a decision in which the claimant prevails and the order becomes final.

(2) The Insurance Commissioner or his or her successors, arbitrators, mediators, the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, or a court shall enter an order within 30 days awarding reasonable attorney’s fees not to exceed $125 per hour and reasonable costs of the claimant to be paid by the private carriers or self‑insured employers, whichever is applicable, which shall be paid as directed. In no event may an award of the claimant’s attorney’s fees under this subsection exceed $500 per litigated medical issue, not to exceed $2,500 in a claim.

(3) In determining the reasonableness of the attorney’s fees to be awarded, the Insurance Commissioner, arbitrator, mediator, Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, or court shall consider the experience of the attorney, the complexity of the issue, the hours expended, and the contingent nature of the fee.

(d) This section becomes effective on July 1, 2022.

CHAPTER 29A. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT.

ARTICLE 5. CONTESTED CASES.

§29A-5-4. Judicial review of contested cases.

(a) Any party adversely affected by a final order or decision in a contested case is entitled to judicial review thereof under this chapter, but nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to prevent other means of review, redress, or relief provided by law.

(b) Proceedings for review of any final order or decision issued on or before June 30, 2022, shall be instituted by filing a petition, at the election of the petitioner, in either the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, or in the circuit court of the county in which the petitioner or any one of the petitioners resides or does business, or with the judge thereof in vacation, within 30 days after the date upon which such party received notice of the final order or decision of the agency. Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, proceedings for judicial review of any final order or decision issued after June 30, 2022, must be instituted by filing an appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals as provided in §51‑11‑1 et seq. of this code.  A copy of the petition shall be served upon the agency and all other parties of record by registered or certified mail. The petition shall state whether the appeal is taken on questions of law or questions of fact, or both. No appeal bond shall be required to affect any such appeal.

(c) The filing of the petition shall not stay enforcement of the agency order or decision or act as a supersedeas thereto, but the agency may stay such enforcement, and the appellant, at any time after the filing of his or her petition, may apply to such circuit court for a stay of or supersedeas to such final order or decision. Pending the appeal, the court may grant a stay or supersedeas upon such terms as it deems proper.

(d) Within 15 days after receipt of a copy of the petition by the agency, or within such further time as the court may allow, the agency shall transmit to such circuit court the original or a certified copy of the entire record of the proceeding under review, including a transcript of all testimony and all papers, motions, documents, evidence, and records as were before the agency, all agency staff memoranda submitted in connection with the case, and a statement of matters officially noted; but, by stipulation of all parties to the review proceeding, the record may be shortened. The expense of preparing such record shall be taxed as a part of the costs of the appeal. The appellant shall provide security for costs satisfactory to the court. Any party unreasonably refusing to stipulate to limit the record may be taxed by the court for the additional costs involved. Upon demand by any party to the appeal, the agency shall furnish, at the cost of the party requesting same, a copy of such record. In the event the complete record is not filed with the court within the time provided for in this section, the appellant may apply to the court to have the case docketed, and the court shall order such record filed.

(e) Appeals taken on questions of law, fact, or both, shall be heard upon assignments of error filed in the cause or set out in the briefs of the appellant. Errors not argued by brief may be disregarded, but the court may consider and decide errors which are not assigned or argued. The court or judge shall fix a date and time for the hearing on the petition, but such hearing, unless by agreement of the parties, shall not be held sooner than 10 days after the filing of the petition, and notice of such date and time shall be forthwith given to the agency.

(f) The review shall be conducted by the court without a jury and shall be upon the record made before the agency, except that in cases of alleged irregularities in procedure before the agency, not shown in the record, testimony thereon may be taken before the court. The court may hear oral arguments and require written briefs.

(g) The court may affirm the order or decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings. It shall reverse, vacate, or modify the order or decision of the agency if the substantial rights of the petitioner or petitioners have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, decision, or order are:

(1) In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; or

(2) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or

(3) Made upon unlawful procedures; or

(4) Affected by other error of law; or

(5) Clearly wrong in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record; or

(6) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.

(h) The judgment of the circuit court or the Intermediate Court of Appeals, whichever is applicable, shall be final unless reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeals of this state in accordance with the provisions of §29A‑6‑1 of this code.

ARTICLE 6. APPEALS.

§29A-6-1. Supreme Court of Appeals.

(a) Any party adversely affected by the final judgment of the circuit court under this chapter may seek review thereof by appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeals of this state, and jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon such court to hear and entertain such appeals upon application made therefor in the manner and within the time provided by law for civil appeals generally: Provided, That a circuit court has no jurisdiction to review a final order or decision in a contested case issued after June 30, 2022.

(b) Any party adversely affected by the final order, decision, or judgment of the Intermediate Court of Appeals under this chapter may seek review thereof by petition to the Supreme Court of Appeals, pursuant to the requirements of §51‑11‑1 et seq. of this code.

CHAPTER 51. COURTS AND THEIR OFFICERS.

ARTICLE 2A. FAMILY COURTS.

§51-2A-24. Review by Intermediate Court of Appeals; transfer of jurisdiction from circuit court.

a) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, an appeal of a final order or decision entered by a family court after June 30, 2022, must be made to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, as provided in §51‑11‑1 et seq. of this code.

(b) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, a circuit court has no jurisdiction to review a final order or decision entered by a family court after June 30, 2022, if review of the final order or decision is within the jurisdiction of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, as provided in §51‑11‑5 of this code.

ARTICLE 9. RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR JUDGES OF COURTS OF RECORD.

§51-9-1a. Definitions.

(a) As used in this article, the term ‘judge’, ‘judge of any court of record’, or ‘judge of any court of record of this state’ means, refers to, and includes judges of the several circuit courts, judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, and justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals. For purposes of this article, the terms do not mean, refer to, or include family court judges.

(b) ‘Actuarially equivalent’ or ‘of equal actuarial value’ means a benefit of equal value computed upon the basis of the mortality table and interest rates as set and adopted by the retirement board in accordance with the provisions of this article: Provided, That when used in the context of compliance with the federal maximum benefit requirements of Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code, ‘actuarially equivalent’ shall be computed using the mortality tables and interest rates required to comply with those requirements.

(c) ‘Beneficiary’ means any person, except a member, who is entitled to an annuity or other benefit payable by the retirement system.

(d) ‘Board’ means the Consolidated Public Retirement Board created pursuant to §5-10D-1 et seq. of this code.

(e) ‘Final average salary’ means the average of the highest 36 consecutive months’ compensation received by the member as a judge of any court of record of this state.

(f) ‘Internal Revenue Code’ means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as it has been amended.

(g) ‘Member’ means a judge participating in this system.

(h) ‘Plan year’ means the 12-month period commencing on July 1 of any designated year and ending the following June 30.

(i) ‘Required beginning date’ means April 1 of the calendar year following the later of: (1) The calendar year in which the member attains age 70 and one-half; or (2) the calendar year in which the member retires or otherwise separates from covered employment.

(j) ‘Retirement system’ or ‘system’ means the Judges’ Retirement System created and established by this article. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the provisions of this article are applicable only to circuit judges, judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals, and justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals in the manner specified in this article. No service as a family court judge may be construed to qualify a person to participate in the Judges’ Retirement System or used in any manner as credit toward eligibility for retirement benefits under the Judges’ Retirement System.

ARTICLE 11. THE WEST VIRGINIA APPELLATE REORGANIZATION ACT.

§51-11-1. Short title

This article is known and may be cited as the West Virginia Appellate Reorganization Act of 2021.

§51-11-2. Definitions.

For the purpose of this article:

‘Circuit court’ means a circuit court of this state, as provided in §51‑2‑1 of this code.

‘Clerk’ means the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

‘Intermediate Court of Appeals’ means the Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia created by this article.

‘Judge’ means a person appointed or elected to serve as a Judge for the Intermediate Court of Appeals, pursuant to this article.

‘Supreme Court of Appeals’ means the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

§51-11-3. West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals; constitutional authority; Court created; judges; qualifications of judges; location; clerk.

(a) The Legislature finds that:

(1) Section one, article VIII of the Constitution of West Virginia explicitly recognizes the power of the Legislature to establish an intermediate court of appeals.

(2) Section six, article VIII of the Constitution of West Virginia acknowledges that appellate jurisdiction ‘may be conferred by law exclusively upon an intermediate appellate court’ and numerous additional references to the potential creation of an intermediate appellate court by the Legislature appear throughout the Constitution.

(b) In accordance with Section One, Article VIII of the West Virginia Constitution, the West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals is created. The Intermediate Court is a court of record and shall issue, as appropriate in each appeal, written opinions, orders, and decisions. The court shall be established and operable on or before July 1, 2022.

(c) The Intermediate Court of Appeals shall convene, conduct proceedings, and issue decisions, rulings, and opinions of the court.

(d) The Intermediate Court of Appeals shall consist of three judges, initially appointed by the Governor in accordance with §51-11-6 of this code.

(1) An Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge must be a member in good standing of the West Virginia State Bar and admitted to practice law in this state for at least ten years prior to appointment or election to the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

(2) An Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge must have been a resident of the State of West Virginia for five years prior to election to the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

(3) An Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge may not engage in any other business, occupation or employment inconsistent with the expeditious, proper and impartial performance of his or her duties as a judicial officer. An Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge is not permitted to engage in the outside practice of law and shall devote full time to his or her duties as a judicial officer.

(4) A person sitting as an Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge may not retain his or her position as judge upon becoming a pre-candidate or candidate for any other elected public office, judicial or nonjudicial.

(e) The Intermediate Court of Appeals may be located in any seat of county government within the state, or in any other place which is convenient to litigants designated by the Intermediate Court of Appeals for the purpose of hearing oral argument, or may be located in a fixed location, in a facility provided by the Clerk pursuant to §51‑11‑8 of this code.

(f) The Clerk of the Supreme Court shall act as clerk of the Intermediate Court of Appeals. The Clerk shall keep a complete record of the cases and proceedings of the Intermediate Court of Appeals. The Clerk, subject to the approval of the Supreme Court, may employ additional staff for the performance of duties relating to the court of appeals and designate a deputy clerk to oversee the administration of the Intermediate Court of Appeal

§51-11-4. Jurisdiction; limitations.

(a) The Intermediate Court of Appeals has no original jurisdiction.

(b) Unless specifically provided otherwise in this article, appeals of the following matters shall be made to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, which has appellate jurisdiction over such matters:

(1) Final judgments or orders of a circuit court in civil cases, entered after June 30, 2022; Provided, that the Supreme Court of Appeals may, on its own accord, obtain jurisdiction over any civil case filed in the Intermediate Court;

(2) Final judgments or orders of a family court, entered after June 30, 2022;

(3) Final judgments or orders of a circuit court concerning guardianship or conservatorship matters, entered after June 30, 2022, pursuant to §44A‑1‑1 et seq. of this code;

(4) Final judgments, orders, or decisions of an agency or an administrative law judge entered after June 30, 2022, heretofore appealable to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County pursuant to §29A‑5‑4 or any other provision of this code;

(5) Final orders or decisions of the Health Care Authority issued prior to June 30, 2022, in a certificate of need review, but transferred to the jurisdiction of the Intermediate Court of Appeals upon termination of the Office of Judges pursuant to §16-2D-16a of this code;

(6) Final orders or decisions issued by the Office of Judges after June 30, 2022, and prior to its termination, as provided in §16-2D-16 and §23-5-8a of this code; and

(7) Final orders or decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review pursuant to §23‑5‑1 et seq. of this code, entered after June 30, 2022.

(c) In appeals properly filed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, the parties shall be afforded a full and meaningful review on the record of the lower tribunal and an opportunity to be heard.

(d) The Intermediate Court of Appeals does not have appellate jurisdiction over the following matters:

(1) Judgments or final orders issued in any criminal proceeding in this state: Provided, that if the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals should adopt a policy of discretionary review of criminal appeals then the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction of such judgments or final orders;

(2) Judgments or final orders issued in any juvenile proceeding pursuant to §49‑4‑701 et seq. of this code;

(3) Judgments or final orders issued in child abuse and neglect proceedings pursuant to §49‑4‑601 et seq. of this code;

(4) Orders of commitment, issued pursuant to §27‑5‑1 et seq. of this code;

(5) Any proceedings of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board;

(6) Any proceedings of the Judicial Investigation Commission;

(7) Final decisions of the Public Service Commission, issued pursuant to §24‑5‑1 of this code;

(8) Interlocutory appeals;

(9) Certified questions of law; and

(10) Extraordinary remedies, as provided in §53-1-1 et seq. of this code, and any appeal of a decision or order of another court regarding an extraordinary remedy.

§51-11-5. Motion for direct review by Supreme Court of Appeals.

(a) Within 20 days after a petition for appeal is filed in the Intermediate Court of Appeals, a party may file a motion in the Supreme Court of Appeals for direct review of a final judgment or order that is otherwise within the appellate jurisdiction of the Intermediate Court of Appeals pursuant to §51‑11‑5 of this code.

(b) The Supreme Court of Appeals may grant a motion filed pursuant to this section if both of the following extraordinary circumstances exist:

(1) The appeal involves a question of fundamental public importance; and

(2) The appeal involves exigencies, in which time is of the essence, necessitating direct review of the appeal by the Supreme Court of Appeals.

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, if the Supreme Court of Appeals grants a motion filed pursuant to this section within 20 days after such motion is filed, jurisdiction over the appeal is transferred to the Supreme Court of Appeals according to all applicable rules of the court:

§51-11-6. Election of judges; initial appointment and election; vacancies; length and conditions of judicial terms.

(a) The three Judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be elected on a nonpartisan basis to serve 10-year terms, subject to the exceptions for initial appointments and elections contained in subsection (b) and subsection (c) of this section.

(b) Nomination and election to fill initial vacancies. —The Judges shall be nominated and appointed according to the following procedure:

(1) (A) On or before January 1, 2022, the Judicial Vacancy Advisory Commission, established pursuant to §3-10-3a of this code, shall publish notice of the judicial vacancies for the Intermediate Court of Appeals and begin accepting applications from qualified individuals for the position of Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals. The Commission is responsible for reviewing and evaluating candidates for possible appointment to the Intermediate Court of Appeals by the Governor. In reviewing candidates, the Commission may accept applications from any attorney who believes he or she to be qualified for the judgeships. The Commission may accept comments from and request information from any person or source.

(B) The Commission shall recommend three qualified nominees for each position for Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge: Provided, That each person on the list must meet the requirements of §51-11-3(d) of this code at the time such person will begin his or her term on the court.

(2) The Governor shall review the list certified by the Judicial Vacancy Advisory Commission and nominate three qualified candidates to serve as judge. The Governor shall make his or her nominations without regard to political partisanship or affiliation. If the Governor does not select a nominee for the position of judge from the names provided by the Commission, he or she shall notify the committee of that circumstance and the Commission shall provide additional names for consideration by the Governor.

(3) The initial appointment term for each of the judges, at the discretion of the Governor, shall be as follows: one judge shall be selected to serve a two and one-half year term set to expire on December 31, 2024, one judge shall be selected to serve a four and one-half year term set to expire on December 31, 2026, and one judge shall be elected to serve a six and one-half year term set to expire on December 31, 2028.

(4) Upon confirmation by the West Virginia Senate, an individual appointed to serve as a Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals pursuant to this subsection shall take an oath of office and commence his or her duties on July 1, 2022.

(c) After the initial appointment, the Judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be elected on a nonpartisan basis by division during the primary election in every year during which a sitting judge’s term will expire for a ten-year term of office, and the judge’s term shall commence on January 1 of the year following, as set forth in §3-5-1 et seq. of this code.

(d) If a vacancy occurs in the office of Intermediate Court Judge, the Governor shall fill the vacancy by appointment as provided in §3-10-3 and §3-10-3a of this code.

(e) No person sitting as a judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals may retain his or her position as judge upon becoming a candidate for any elected public office, judicial or nonjudicial.

(f) The Legislature recognizes that the Chief Justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has authority to temporarily assign judges to the Intermediate Court of Appeals pursuant to section eight, article VIII of the Constitution of West Virginia, in the event that a judge is temporarily unable to serve on the court.

§51-11-7. Rules of practice and procedure; fees; deadlines.

(a) Section three, article VIII of the Constitution of West Virginia grants the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia supervisory control over all intermediate appellate courts in the state, including the power to promulgate rules for the procedures of an intermediate appellate court created by statute. In accordance with those provisions, the Intermediate Court of Appeals is therefore subject to the administrative control, supervision, and oversight of the Supreme Court of Appeals and unless specifically provided otherwise in this article, the pleadings, practice, and procedure in all matters before the Intermediate Court of Appeals are governed by rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Appeals.

(b) Filing; records. — All notices of appeals, petitions, documents, and records in connection with an appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be filed in accordance with rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Appeals.  Appeals to the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Appeals.  All appeals and other related documents shall be filed by electronic means, when available.

(c) Fees. —

(1) The Clerk of the Supreme Court of Appeals may charge a party appealing to the Intermediate Court of Appeals a filing fee in the amount of $200.

(2) All moneys collected pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited in the Ryan Brown Addiction Prevention and Recovery Fund, created by §16-53-2 of this code, and all expenditures from the fund shall comply with the requirements of that section.

(d) Appeal bonds. — The court may order the payment of an appeal bond before an appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals may commence, pursuant to rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Appeals, and when applicable, the requirements of §58‑5‑14 of this code.

(e) Oral argument. — The Intermediate Court of Appeals has discretion to determine whether appellate review of a case before the court requires oral argument.

§51-11-8. Administration of court.

(a) In accordance with section three, article VIII of the Constitution of West Virginia, the Intermediate Court of Appeals is subject to the administrative control, supervision, and oversight of the Supreme Court of Appeals. Under that same provisions, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals is the ‘administrative head’ of all West Virginia courts, empowering the chief justice to exercise supervisory control over an intermediate court of appeals.

(b) The Administrative Director of the Supreme Court shall provide for the requisite physical facilities, furniture, fixtures and equipment necessary for the efficient operation of the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

(c) (1) In order to minimize any costs associated with the necessary facilities for the Intermediate Court of Appeals, the Administrative Director of the Supreme Court shall make existing courtrooms throughout the state, including the courtroom of the Supreme Court of Appeals, available for use by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at times convenient both to the Intermediate Court of Appeals and the local court.

(2) The Administrative Director of the Supreme Court may also contract with the Department of Administration, county commissions and private parties to provide for space that is suitable for the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Facilities may include, but are not limited to, courtrooms in county courthouses, courtrooms in federal courthouses, county commission rooms in county courthouses, rooms or facilities at institutions of higher education, and other suitable spaces in federal, state, county, or municipal buildings throughout the state.

(d) Chief Judge. — One Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be chosen Chief Judge. The manner of choosing the Chief Judge and providing for periodic rotation of the position of Chief Judge shall be determined by rules to be established by the Supreme Court.

(e) Staff. — The Administrative Director of the Supreme Court of Appeals shall provide administrative support and may employ additional staff, as necessary, for the efficient operation of the Intermediate Court of Appeals. The budget for the payment of compensation and expenses of the Intermediate Court of Appeals staff shall be included in the appropriation to the Supreme Court of Appeals.

(f) The budget for the payment of the salaries and benefits for the Intermediate Court of Appeals Judges and staff, facilities, furniture, fixtures and equipment shall be included in the appropriation for the Supreme Court. To the extent possible, the Supreme Court shall designate existing facilities and existing staff members for use by the Intermediate Court of Appeals to minimize the costs for establishing and operating the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

§51-11-9. Written opinions; precedential effect.

(a) The Intermediate Court of Appeals shall issue, as appropriate in each appeal, written opinions, orders, and decisions: Provided, That a written decision on the merits shall be issued as a matter of right in each appeal that is properly filed and within the jurisdiction of the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

(b) A written opinion, order, or decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals is binding precedent for the decisions of all circuit courts, family courts, magistrate courts, and agencies unless the opinion, order, or decision is overruled or modified by the Supreme Court of Appeals.

§51-11-10. Discretionary review by Supreme Court of Appeals by petition

(a) A party in interest may petition the Supreme Court of Appeals for appeal of a final order or judgment of the Intermediate Court of Appeals in accordance with rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Appeals.

(b) Upon the proper filing of a notice of appeal in the Supreme Court of Appeals, the order or judgment of the Intermediate Court of Appeals may be stayed pending the appeal, in accordance with rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Appeals.

(c) The Supreme Court of Appeals has discretion to grant or deny the petition for appeal or certiorari of a decision by the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

§51-11-11. Judicial compensation and benefits; expenses.

(a) The annual salary of a Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals is $142,500.  The budget for the payment of compensation and expenses of Intermediate Court of Appeals judges shall be included in the appropriation for the Supreme Court of Appeals.

(b) Judges of the Intermediate Court of Appeals and staff shall be reimbursed for their actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties under the guidelines prescribed by the Administrative Director of the Supreme Court of Appeals.

§51-11-12. Attorney General as counsel for state.

The Attorney General shall appear as counsel for the state in all cases pending in the Intermediate Court of Appeals, subject to the same requirements and restrictions provided in §5‑3‑2 of this code that apply to the Attorney General’s representation of the state in cases pending in the Supreme Court of Appeals.

§51-11-13. Severability.

The provisions of this article are severable. If any portion of this article is declared unconstitutional or the application of any part of this article is held invalid, the remaining portions of this article and their applicability shall remain valid and enforceable.

CHAPTER 58. APPEAL AND ERROR.

ARTICLE 5. APPELLATE RELIEF IN THE INTERMEDIATE court of appeals AND the SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS.

§58-5-1. When appeal lies.

(a) A party to a civil action may appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeals from a final judgment of any circuit court or from an order of any circuit court constituting a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all claims or parties upon an express determination by the circuit court that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment as to such claims or parties: Provided, That an appeal of a final order or judgment of a circuit court entered after June 30, 2022, shall be to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, as required by §51‑11‑1 et seq. of this code.

(b) As provided in §51‑11‑13 of this code, a party in interest may petition the Supreme Court of Appeals for appeal of a final order or judgment of the Intermediate Court of Appeals in accordance with rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Appeals.

(c) The defendant in a criminal action may appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeals from a final judgment of any circuit court in which there has been a conviction, or which affirms a conviction obtained in an inferior court.

      Delegates Skaff, Evans, Fleischauer, Barach, Walker, Pushkin, Zukoff, Brown and Lovejoy moved to amend the amendment on page 73, line 13, following the period, by inserting a new section to read as follows:

Ҥ58-5-1a. Tolled effective date for implementation of the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

            (a) Legislative findings- As the most pressing issue in our criminal justice,  public health and judicial systems is the management and rehabilitation of adults whose drug addiction has impacted our state’s children, and rehabilitation of parents that have been abusing or neglecting their children due to addiction should be the state’s judicial system’s top priority through the establishment of family drug treatment courts,  and diverting resources away from that effort to establish an Intermediate Court of Appeals would be a misuse of limited government funds and focus away from what must be seen as the most critical crisis facing our state.  Therefore, the implementation of the establishment of the intermediate court shall be tolled until the judiciary implements family drug treatment courts throughout the State of West Virginia.

(b) Notwithstanding any other the provisions of Enrolled Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 275 enacted during the 2021 Regular Session of the West Virginia Legislature to the contrary, this Act shall become effective only when the West Virginia Supreme Court enters into its record a finding that family drug treatment courts as authorized pursuant to §62-15B-1 et seq. of this code are established and operational in all judicial circuits in the state.   If family drug treatment courts have not been established in all judicial circuits by July 1, 2021, the July 1, 2022 effective date for the establishment of the Intermediate Court of Appeals shall be tolled and become effective one year following the certification of the West Virginia Supreme Court by order of the court finding the requirements of this section have been fulfilled.  The Court upon entering such order shall provide notice to the Speaker of the West Virginia House of Delegates, the President of State Senate, and the Governor, and publish a notice in the West Virginia State Register providing public notice that family drug treatment courts have been established and are operational in each judicial circuit and the date the Intermediate Court of Appeals will be operational, and as a result, the provisions of this Act become effective as provided herein.”

On the adoption of the amendment to the amendment, the yeas and nays were demanded, which demand was sustained.

The yeas and nays having been ordered, they were taken (Roll No. 318), and there were—yeas 28, nays 72, absent and not voting none, with the yeas being as follows:

Yeas: Barach, Bates, Boggs, Brown, Diserio, Doyle, Evans, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Garcia, Griffith, Hansen, Hornbuckle, Lovejoy, Martin, McGeehan, Miller, Nestor, Paynter, Pethtel, Pushkin, Rowe, Skaff, Thompson, Walker, Williams, Young and Zukoff.

So, a majority of the members present not having voted in the affirmative, the amendment to the amendment was rejected.

Delegates Bates, Young and Fleischauer moved to amend the amendment on page 49, section 11a, line 59, following the period, by inserting the following:

Any person, not a temporary or probationary employee, employed by the Office of Judges who is terminated or laid off as a result of the expiration of the Office of Judges shall be afforded the opportunity to apply to the Board of Review or to transfer or apply for other state employment if he or she is an employee in good standing at the time of termination or layoff.  The Division of Personnel shall establish and maintain, for a period of two years, a list of all employees who were laid off or terminated by the Office of Judges pursuant to this section, and who wish to remain eligible for employment with the state. The Workers Compensation Board of Review shall give employees of the Office of Judges on the list priority for employment in an available position at the Workers Compensation Board of Review equivalent to the position that person held in the Office of Judges unless the Board of Review determines that the person is less qualified than other applicants for the position.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, the Division of Personnel shall give employees of the Office of Judges on the list priority to transfer to or be employed for any other state position in classified or exempt service for which the employee is qualified and applies.”

On the adoption of the amendment to the amendment, the yeas and nays were demanded, which demand was sustained.

The yeas and nays having been ordered, they were taken (Roll No. 319), and there were—yeas 29, nays 71, absent and not voting none, with the yeas being as follows:

Yeas: Anderson, Barach, Bates, Boggs, Brown, Diserio, Doyle, Evans, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Garcia, Griffith, Hanna, Hansen, Higginbotham, Hornbuckle, Lovejoy, McGeehan, Miller, Paynter, Pethtel, Pushkin, Rowe, Skaff, Thompson, Walker, Williams, Young and Zukoff.

So, a majority of the members present not having voted in the affirmative, the amendment to the amendment was rejected.

The question being on the adoption of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Finance, the same was put, and prevailed.

The bill was then ordered to third reading.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2266, Relating to expanding certain insurance coverages for pregnant women; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2581, Providing for the valuation of natural resources property and an alternate method of appeal of proposed valuation of natural resources property; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2592, Require Counties and Municipalities to hold all local elections during statewide elections; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was, at the request of  Delegate Summers, and by unanimous consent, postponed one day.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2667, To create a cost saving program for state buildings regarding energy efficiency; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2720, Creating a Merit-Based Personnel System within DOT; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

H. B. 2768, Supplementing, amending and increasing an existing item of appropriation from the State Road Fund, to the Department of Transportation, Division of Highways; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2769, Supplementing, amending and increasing items of existing appropriation from the State Road Fund to the Department of Transportation, Division of Motor Vehicles; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

H. B. 2790, Supplementing, amending, decreasing, and increasing items of existing appropriation to Division of Highways; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

H. B. 2915, Relating to public records management and preservation; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2927, Adding Caregiving expenses to campaign finance expense; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was, at the request of Delegate Summers, and by unanimous consent, postponed one day.

H. B. 3082, Stabilizing funding sources for the DEP Division of Air Quality; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3106, To change the hearing requirement for misdemeanors to 10 days; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

H. B. 3298, Making a supplemental appropriation to Dept. of Commerce, Dept. of Education, Senior Services and Civil Contingent Fund; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

H. B. 3304, Authorizing the Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation to establish a Reentry and Transitional Housing Program; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

 

First Reading

The following joint resolution and bills on first reading, coming up in regular order, were each read a first time and ordered to second reading:

Com. Sub. for H. J. R. 3, Property Tax Modernization Amendment,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2017, Rewriting the Criminal Code,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2095, Providing increased protections for the welfare of domestic animals,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2224, Relating to complaints against public agencies to obtain records through the Freedom of Information Act,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2370, Provide that Public Service Districts cannot charge sewer rates for filling a swimming pool,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2488, Relating to an occupational limited license,

H. B. 2730, Relating to persons filing federal bankruptcy petition to exempt certain property of the estate,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2751, Modernize the process for dissolution of municipal corporations in this State,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2876, Modify the five-year waiting period and 100-person minimum for an association health plan, and to allow new flexibility granted under federal rules,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 2884, To make changes to the FOIA law to protect public utility customer databases from disclosure, with exceptions,

H. B. 2908, Relating to disclosure of information by online marketplaces to inform consumers,

H. B. 2918, Relating to Family Drug Treatment Court,

H. B. 2997, Adding a defense to the civil penalty imposed for a result of delivery of fuel to a state other than the destination state printed on the shipping document for fuel,

H. B. 3030, Relating to gross weight limitations and road restrictions in Greenbrier and Pocahontas Counties,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3036, Sunsetting the Board of Sanitarians,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3072, Sunset the Board of Forestry,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3074, Relating to information on organ and tissue donations,

H. B. 3089, Make utility workers essential employees during a state of emergency,

H. B. 3286, Making a supplementary appropriation to the Division of Human Services – Child Care and Development,

H. B. 3287, Making a supplementary appropriation to the Department of Homeland Security,

H. B. 3288, Supplementing and amending appropriations by decreasing and increasing existing items of appropriation in the DHHR,

H. B. 3289, Supplementary appropriation to the Department of Commerce, Geological and Economic Survey,

H. B. 3291, Making a supplementary appropriation to the Department of Homeland Security, Division of Administrative Services,

H. B. 3292, Making a supplementary appropriation to the Department of Health and Human Resources, Division of Health,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3295, Making a supplemental appropriation to Division of Human Services and Division of Health Central Office,

Com. Sub. for H. B. 3297, Making a supplemental appropriation to the Department of Veterans’ Assistance - Veterans Home,

H. B. 3308, Relating to increasing number of limited video lottery terminals,

H. B. 3309, Creating and funding a Video Lottery Terminals Modernization Fund,

H. B. 3310, Relating to the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission,

H. B. 3311, Relating to the cost of medical records,

And,

H. B. 3312, Establishing a memorial to child labor and child workers who died in the course of employment in this state.

Conference Committee Report

      Delegate J. Pack, from the Committee of Conference on matters of disagreement between the two houses, as to

      Eng. Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 2263, Update the regulation of pharmacy benefit managers submitted the following report, which was received:

      Your Committee of Conference on the disagreeing votes of the two houses as to the amendments of the Senate and the House of Delegates to Eng. Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 2263 having met, after full and free conference, have agreed to recommend and do recommend to their respective houses, as follows:

      That the House and Senate recede from their positions, and agree to the same as follows:

      (l) A covered individual’s defined cost sharing for each prescription drug shall be calculated at the point of sale based on a price that is reduced by an amount equal to at least 100% of all rebates received, or to be received, in connection with the dispensing or administration of the prescription drug.  Any rebate over and above the defined cost sharing would then be passed on to the health plan to reduce premiums.   Nothing precludes an insurer from decreasing a covered individual’s defined cost sharing by an amount greater than what is previously stated. The Commissioner may propose a legislative rule or by policy effectuate the provisions of this subsection. Notwithstanding any other effective date to the contrary, the amendments to this article enacted during the 2021 regular legislative session shall apply to all policies, contracts, plans, or agreements subject to this section that are delivered, executed, amended, adjusted, or renewed on or after January 1, 2022.

And by amending the title by inserting a new title to read as follows:

Eng. Committee Substitute for House Bill 2263 “A Bill to amend and reenact §5-16-9 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; to amend and reenact §33-51-2, §33-51-3, §33-51-8, and §33-51-9 of said code; and to amend said code by adding thereto two new sections, designated §33-51-11 and §33-51-12, all relating to the regulation of pharmacy benefit managers; updating the reporting requirements related Public Employees Insurance Agency; expanding scope; defining terms; regulating the reimbursements of pharmacy benefit managers; requiring a adequate network; providing rulemaking authority; providing an effective date; requiring filing of certain methodologies utilized by pharmacy benefit managers; prohibiting certain practices by pharmacy benefits managers; providing consumer choice for pharmacies; setting guidelines for pharmacy benefit plans; requiring rebates to be passed down; requiring reporting; and requiring the commissioner to consider information in reviewing rates.”

                                                                  Respectfully submitted,

Jeff Pack, Chair                                            Mike Maroney, Chair

            D. Jeffries,                                                          Ryan Weld,

            Ric Griffith,                                                          Ron Stollings,

               Conferees on the part                                     Conferees on the part

                 of the House of Delegates.                              on the part of the Senate.

      The question of adoption of the report of the Committee of Conference was put and prevailed.

      The bill, as amended by said report, was then put upon its passage.

      On the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 320), and there were—yeas 100, nays none, absent and not voting none.

      So, a majority of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2263) passed.

      Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Miscellaneous Business

Pursuant to House Rule 94b, a form was filed with the Clerk’s Office to be added as a cosponsor of the following:

H. B. 2095: Delegate Kimble.

At 1:37 p.m., the House of Delegates adjourned until 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 30, 2021.


 

HOUSE OF DELEGATES

STEPHEN J. HARRISON, Clerk

Building 1, Room M-212

1900 Kanawha Blvd., East

Charleston, WV 25305-0470