SENATE
HOUSE
JOINT
BILL STATUS
STATE LAW
REPORTS
EDUCATIONAL
CONTACT
home
home

SENATE (2017)(2X):| Bills Introduced | Bill History | Topical Index | Committee Schedule | Calendar | Journal | Menu |

Senate Journal


Day 29 (11-13-2017) - [PDF]
Day 02 (10-17-2017) - [PDF]
Day 01 (10-16-2017) - [PDF]
Day 85 (01-08-2018) - [PDF]
Day 50 (12-04-2017) - [PDF]

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE

SENATE JOURNAL

EIGHTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE

SECOND EXTRAORDINARY SESSION, 2017

SECOND DAY

____________

Charleston, West Virginia, Tuesday, October 17, 2017

The Senate met at 12 Noon.

(Senator Carmichael, Mr. President, in the Chair.)

Prayer was offered by the Honorable C. Edward Gaunch, a senator from the eighth district.

The Senate was then led in recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance by the Honorable Ron Stollings, a senator from the seventh district.

Pending the reading of the Journal of Monday, October 16, 2017,

At the request of Senator Weld, unanimous consent being granted, the Journal was approved and the further reading thereof dispensed with.

The Clerk presented the following communications from various state agencies as required by the provisions of law:

??????????? Economic Development Authority (?31-15-29)

??????????? Environmental Protection, Department of

??????????????????????? Oil and Gas Operating Permit and Processing Fund (?22-6-29)

Oil and Gas Reclamation Fund (?22-6-29)

Special Reclamation Fund Advisory Council (?22-1-17)

??????????? Occupational Therapy, Board of (?30-1-12)

The Senate proceeded to the third order of business.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the amendment by that body, passage as amended, to take effect from passage, and requested the concurrence of the Senate in the House of Delegates amendments, as to

Eng. Senate Bill 2002, Allowing certain tax information be shared with designated DOH employees.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the bill was taken up for immediate consideration.

The following House of Delegates amendments to the bill were reported by the Clerk:

On page one, section five-cc, line four, by striking out the word ?may? and inserting in lieu thereof the word ?shall?;

On page two, section five-cc, line fifteen, by striking out the words ?appears to be? and inserting in lieu thereof the word ?is?;

And,

On page two, section five-cc, line twenty-two, by striking out the words ?appears to be? and inserting in lieu thereof the word ?is?.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the following amendments to the House of Delegates amendments to the bill (Eng. S. B. 2002) were reported by the Clerk, considered simultaneously, and adopted:

On page two, section five-cc, subsection (a), subdivision (4), by striking out the word ?is? and inserting in lieu thereof the words ?appears to be?;

And,

On page two, section five-cc, subsection (a), subdivision (6), by striking out the word ?is? and inserting in lieu thereof the words ?appears to be?.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the Senate concurred in the House of Delegates amendments, as amended.

Engrossed Senate Bill 2002, as amended, was then put upon its passage.

On the passage of the bill, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, a majority of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2002) passed with its title.

Senator Ferns moved that the bill take effect from passage.

On this question, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, two thirds of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2002) takes effect from passage.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate and request concurrence therein.

The Senate proceeded to the sixth order of business.

On motions for leave, severally made, the following bills were introduced and read by their titles:

By Senators Carmichael (Mr. President) and Prezioso (By Request of the Executive):

Senate Bill 2004?A Bill to amend and reenact ?11-21-8a and ?11-21-8e of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; and to amend and reenact ?11-24-23a and ?11-24-23e of said code, all relating generally to tax credits for rehabilitation of historic buildings and structures; increasing the amount of tax credit against personal and corporate net income taxes from ten percent to twenty-five percent for expenditures made on or after December 31, 2017; providing for the use of tax credit on or after January 1, 2020; prohibiting eligibility for credit if the taxpayer is in arrears on certain tax payments; providing rule-making authority to the Tax Commissioner; amending carry back and carry forward provisions for tax credit; limiting the maximum amount available for tax credit per project and in the aggregate per West Virginia state fiscal year; requiring the state Historic Preservation Officer to reserve a certain amount of available tax credits for projects where proposed tax credits will not exceed $500,000 per project; authorizing the state Historic Preservation Officer to reallocate unused credits reserved for certain projects; providing procedures for the issuance of tax credit reservations and certificates by the state Historic Preservation Officer; requiring the state Historic Preservation Officer to prescribe and publish a form and instructions for applications for credits; providing for an application fee payable to the state Historic Preservation Officer; requiring the state Historic Preservation Officer to review and act upon applications within thirty days of receipt; and providing a sunset provision.

Referred to the Committee on Finance.

By Senators Carmichael (Mr. President) and Prezioso (By Request of the Executive):

Senate Bill 2005?A Bill finding and declaring a claim against the state and its agency to be a moral obligation of the state; and directing the Auditor to issue warrants for the payment thereof.

At the request of Senator Ferns, unanimous consent being granted, reference of the bill to a committee was dispensed with, and it was taken up for immediate consideration, read a first time and ordered to second reading.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the constitutional rule requiring a bill to be read on three separate days was suspended by a vote of four fifths of the members present, taken by yeas and nays.

On suspending the constitutional rule, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

The bill was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

Engrossed Senate Bill 2005 was then read a third time and put upon its passage.

On the passage of the bill, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, a majority of all the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2005) passed with its title.

Senator Ferns moved that the bill take effect from passage.

On this question, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, two thirds of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2005) takes effect from passage.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate and request concurrence therein.

By Senators Carmichael (Mr. President) and Prezioso (By Request of the Executive):

Senate Bill 2006?A Bill to amend and reenact ?21-1C-2, ?21-1C-4 and ?21-1C-6 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all relating generally to the West Virginia Jobs Act; defining terms; requiring Workforce West Virginia to provide a waiver to an employer if unable to refer certain amount of qualified job applicants to the employer within three business days; increasing and adding civil penalties for violations; providing for written notice of violation to employer for violations; creating a special revenue account; and other technical corrections.

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

At the request of Senator Ferns, unanimous consent being granted, Senator Ferns offered the following resolution from the floor:

Senate Concurrent Resolution 201?Authorizing adjournments of the Senate and House of Delegates.

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia:

That during this Second Extraordinary Session of the Eighty-Third Legislature, the House of Delegates is hereby authorized to adjourn sine die in advance of the Senate, and while remaining in session to consider executive nominations, the Senate is hereby authorized to adjourn, as needed, for more than three days, pursuant to Section 23, Article VI of the Constitution of the State of West Virginia.

At the request of Senator Ferns, unanimous consent being granted, the resolution was taken up for immediate consideration and reference to a committee dispensed with.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution, the same was put and prevailed.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate and request concurrence therein.

The Senate proceeded to the ninth order of business.

Senate Bill 2003, Implementing special hiring procedures for DOH and Tax Division.

On second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time.

At the request of Senator Ferns, and by unanimous consent, the Senate proceeded to the thirteenth order of business.

Senator Ferns called attention to today being the birthday of the senior senator from the fifteenth and on behalf of the Senate extended felicitations and good wishes to Senator Blair, with Senator Ferns leading members in singing ?Happy Birthday?.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the Senate recessed until 3 p.m. today.

Upon expiration of the recess, the Senate reconvened and, at the request of Senator Ferns, unanimous consent being granted, returned to the ninth order of business.

Senate Bill 2003, Implementing special hiring procedures for DOH and Tax Division.

Having been read a second time in earlier proceedings today, and now coming up in regular order, was again reported by the Clerk.

On motions of Senators Trump and Gaunch, the following amendment to the bill was reported by the Clerk and adopted:

By striking out everything after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

That the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, be amended by adding thereto a new section, designated ?11B-1-8; and that said code be amended by adding thereto a new section, designated ?17-2A-24, all to read as follows:

Chapter 11. Department of Revenue.

Article 1. Department of Revenue.

?11B-1-8. Special employment procedures for Tax Division Personnel.

(a) Legislative findings and intent. ?

(1) The Tax Division of the Department of Revenue has approximately one hundred vacancies. The Legislature finds that the division has long had difficulty filling positions which are essential to efficiently and effectively administering, collecting and enforcing the tax laws of this state. The Legislature finds that, to address this problem, the hiring and retention processes of the division must be streamlined to effectively and efficiently meet personnel needs while still affording applicants and employees the due process protections of classified service.

(2) The ratification of the Roads to Prosperity Amendment of 2017 to the Constitution of West Virginia will result in substantially increased funding for roads and highways in the state and the opportunity for in-state and out-of-state contractors to bid on road projects. The need to ensure that all businesses are in compliance with the tax laws of this state will exacerbate the division?s staffing shortage.

(3) The purpose of this section is to allow the division to employ qualified applicants in vacant and new personnel positions within the division in a timely manner and to ensure that the division maintains an adequate workforce to effectively and fairly administer, collect and enforce the tax laws of this state.

(b) Definitions. ? As used in this section:

(1) ?Commissioner? means the Commissioner of the Tax Division of the Department of Revenue or his or her designee; and

(2) ?Division? means the Tax Division of the Department of Revenue.

(c) Special employment procedure; requirements. ? The commissioner shall implement the special merit based application and appointment procedure authorized by the provisions of this section for all the employees of the division to ensure and provide for the selection and retention of competent and qualified personnel. The special application and employment procedure established pursuant to this section shall be effective on and after December 1, 2017, and shall be subject to the following requirements:

(1) The Division of Personnel shall provide competitive registers of eligible applicants when requested by the division to do so within five business days of receipt of the request;

(2) Any position to be filled internally shall be posted for seven calendar days before the division may select an applicant. For positions to be filled with applicants from outside of the division, the public service announcement shall be posted for not less than fourteen calendar days;

(3) Postings shall be active for up to one year;

(4) Notwithstanding any provision of law or rule promulgated under the provisions of this code, the division may employ any person listed on the register for employment as a Tax and Revenue Auditor 1, Tax and Revenue Auditor 2, Tax and Revenue Auditor 3, Revenue Agent 1, Revenue Agent 2, Investigator 2 or Investigator 3 without regard to the person?s position on the applicable register;

(5) The division shall have full authority to evaluate applicants for employment or promotion within the division to positions within the classified service and classified-exempt service. The division shall have sole authority to determine whether applicants for positions with the division meet minimum position requirements;

(6) The division shall have full authority to make classification determinations for positions within the division by using the classification system approved by the State Personnel Board. The division may independently submit to the State Personnel Board recommendations for the approval of new division classifications or the amendment of current division classifications;

(7) The division shall have full authority to exercise its discretion regarding the application of the Division of Personnel?s system of compensation for positions within the classified and classified-exempt service: Provided, That application of this subdivision shall be uniform. The division may independently submit to the State Personnel Board recommendations for the approval of a special pay scale for the division?s personnel;

(8) Notwithstanding any provision of the code or of any rule to the contrary, the Division of Personnel shall not be a mandatory party to any public employee grievance filed against the division. The Division of Personnel shall not be a signatory to, and may not override or otherwise challenge, the division?s decisions regarding settlement terms and conditions in employee grievances or other legal proceedings;

(9) The Division of Personnel shall facilitate or perform any lawful action necessary to initiate or complete the division?s employment transactions, including, but not limited to, posting positions on applicable systems, initiating public service announcements when requested by the division, and processing necessary forms;

(10) The division shall comply with all applicable record retention requirements provided by law;

(11) The division is authorized to declare any positions effectively vacant due to employee separations, which were not processed prior to the division being placed under the wvOASIS system, vacant and subject to being filled pursuant to the provisions of this section;

(12) The division shall have the flexibility to utilize all vacant position numbers when posting to fill a vacancy and to post vacant positions utilizing multiple classifications with corresponding job descriptions when the commissioner determines it to be necessary and in the best interest of the division; and

(13) For purposes of this section, a vacancy created when an employee of the division separates or goes on terminal leave may be posted upon receipt of the notice that the employee separated or commenced such leave.

(d) Exemption from regular application and appointment requirements. ? When seeking applications or making appointments pursuant to the special procedure authorized by subsection (c) of this section, the division is not required to comply with Division of Personnel procedures for seeking applications and making appointments to classified service positions as provided by the provisions of articles six and six-a, chapter twenty-nine of this code or in any other provision of this code, including those procedures promulgated in procedural or legislative rules promulgated by the commissioner pursuant to article three, chapter twenty-nine-a of this code, except that this section does not exempt the division from provisions of this code, prohibiting nepotism, favoritism, discrimination or unethical practices related to appointment, or the public employee grievance system.

(e) The commissioner may promulgate emergency rules and shall propose legislative rules pursuant to the provisions of article three, chapter twenty-nine-a of this code as may be necessary to implement and comply with the provisions of this section.

(f) The provisions of this section shall apply notwithstanding the provisions of article six or article six-a, chapter twenty-nine of this code to the contrary.

(g) Classified employees of the division shall continue to be covered by the civil service system and may utilize any applicable public employee grievance process.

Chapter 17. Roads and Highways.

?ARTICLE 2A. The West Virginia Commissioner of Highways.

?17-2A-24. Special employment procedures for Division of Highways Personnel.

(a) Legislative findings and intent. ?

(1) The Legislature previously commissioned a performance audit to assess and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the core operations of the Division of Highways. The Division of Highways has long had difficulty filling positions which are essential to constructing and maintaining the state?s highways and bridges. The Legislature finds that the hiring and retention processes of the division must be streamlined to effectively and efficiently meet personnel needs while still affording applicants and employees the due process protections of classified service.

(2) The Legislature has recently approved increased funding for the division which will exacerbate its staffing shortage of hundreds of positions.

(3) The purpose of this section is to allow the Division of Highways to employ qualified applicants to vacant and new personnel positions in the division in a timely manner and to ensure that the Division of Highways has an adequate workforce sufficient to maintain safe roadways for the citizens of West Virginia.

(b) Definitions. ? As used in this section:

(1) ?Commissioner? means the Commissioner of the Division of Highways or his or her designee; and

(2) ?Division? means the Division of Highways.

(c) Special employment procedure; requirements. ? The commissioner shall implement the special merit-based application and appointment procedure authorized by the provisions of this section for all the employees of the division to ensure and provide for the selection and retention of competent and qualified personnel. The special application and employment procedure established pursuant to this section shall be effective on and after December 1, 2017, and shall be subject to the following requirements:

(1) The Division of Personnel shall provide competitive registers of eligible applicants when requested by the division to do so within five business days of receipt of the request;

(2) Any position to be filled internally shall be posted for seven calendar days before the division may select an applicant. For positions to be filled with an applicant from outside of the division, the public service announcement shall be posted for not less than fourteen calendar days;

(3) Postings shall be active for up to one year;

(4) Notwithstanding any provision of law or of any rule promulgated under the provisions of this code, the division may employ any person listed on the Transportation Worker I register for employment as a Transportation Worker I without regard to the person?s position on said register;

(5) The division shall have full authority to evaluate applicants for employment or promotion within the division to positions within the classified service and classified-exempt service. The division shall have sole authority to determine whether applicants for positions with the division meet minimum position requirements;

(6) The division shall have full authority to make classification determinations for positions within the division by using the classification system approved by the State Personnel Board. The division may independently submit to the State Personnel Board recommendations for the approval of new division classifications or the amendment of current division classifications;

(7) The division shall have full authority to exercise its discretion regarding the application of the Division of Personnel?s system of compensation for positions in the division within the classified and classified-exempt service: Provided, That application of the provisions of this subdivision shall be uniform. The division may independently submit to the State Personnel Board recommendations for the approval of a special pay scale for the division?s personnel;

(8) Notwithstanding any provision of the code or of any rule to the contrary, the Division of Personnel shall not be a mandatory party to any public employee grievance filed against the division. The Division of Personnel shall not be a signatory to, and may not override or otherwise challenge, the division?s decisions regarding settlement terms and conditions in employee grievances or other legal proceedings;

(9) The Division of Personnel shall facilitate or perform any lawful action necessary to initiate or complete the division?s employment transactions, including, but not limited to, posting positions on applicable systems, initiating public service announcements when requested by the division, and processing necessary forms;

(10) The division shall comply with all applicable record retention requirements provided by law;

(11) The division is authorized to declare any positions effectively vacant due to employee separations, which were not processed prior to the division being placed under the wvOASIS system, vacant and subject to being filled pursuant to the provisions of this section;

(12) The division shall have the flexibility to utilize all vacant position numbers when posting to fill a vacancy and to post vacant positions utilizing multiple classifications with corresponding job descriptions when the commissioner determines it to be necessary and in the best interest of the agency; and

(13) For purposes of this section, a vacancy created when an employee of the division separates or goes on terminal leave may be posted upon receipt of the notice that the employee has separated or commenced such leave.

(d) Exemption from regular application and appointment requirements. ? When seeking applications or making appointments pursuant to the special procedure authorized by subsection (c) of this section, the division is not required to comply with Division of Personnel procedures for seeking applications and making appointments to classified service positions as provided by the provisions of articles six and six-a, chapter twenty-nine of this code or any other provision of this code, including those procedures promulgated by legislative rules, subject however to the following exceptions:

(1) This section does not exempt the division from provisions of this code, prohibiting nepotism, favoritism, discrimination or unethical practices related to employment and promotion, or the public employee grievance system; and

(2) The provisions of this section may not be applied to hiring procedures applicable to any division classified service position or employee in any manner that disqualifies the division for eligibility for any federal highway funds or assistance.

(e) Rules. ? The commissioner may promulgate emergency rules and shall propose legislative rules pursuant to the provisions of article three, chapter twenty-nine-a of this code as may be necessary to implement and comply with the provisions of this section.

(f) The provisions of this section shall apply notwithstanding any provisions of article six or six-a, chapter twenty-nine of this code to the contrary.

(g) Classified employees of the division shall continue to be covered by the civil service system and may utilize any applicable public employee grievance process.

The bill (S. B. 2003), as amended, was then ordered to engrossment and third reading.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the constitutional rule requiring a bill to be read on three separate days was suspended by a vote of four fifths of the members present, taken by yeas and nays.

On suspending the constitutional rule, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

Engrossed Senate Bill 2003 was then read a third time and put upon its passage.

On the passage of the bill, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, a majority of all the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2003) passed.

On motions of Senators Trump and Gaunch, the following amendment to the title of the bill was reported by the Clerk and adopted:

Eng. Senate Bill 2003?A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated ?11B-1-8; and to amend said code by adding thereto a new section, designated ?17-2A-24, all relating generally to employment procedures of the Division of Highways and the Tax Division of the Department of Revenue; authorizing the Tax Commissioner and the Commissioner of Highways to implement special employment procedures for personnel positions in their respective divisions; making legislative findings; defining terms; establishing requirements for the special employment procedures; exempting Tax Division of the Department of Revenue and Division of Highways from certain other employment procedures; permitting recommendations for new schedules of compensation; exempting Division of Personnel from involvement in certain grievance claims or settlements; directing Division of Personnel to facilitate special employment procedures; requiring Division of Personnel to perform any lawful action necessary to initiate or complete employment transactions of the Division of Highways or the Tax Division under newly established employment procedures; providing for continued application of due process; maintaining efficacy of code provisions prohibiting nepotism, favoritism and discrimination under the special employment procedures; authorizing the Commissioner of Highways and the Tax Commissioner to promulgate emergency rules; and requiring the Commissioner of Highways and the Tax Commissioner to propose legislative rules for the implementation of the special employment procedures authorized for their respective agencies.

Senator Ferns moved that the bill take effect from passage.

On this question, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, two thirds of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2003) takes effect from passage.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate and request concurrence therein.

Without objection, the Senate returned to the third order of business.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the passage by that body, to take effect from passage, and requested the concurrence of the Senate in the passage of

Eng. House Bill 201?A Bill to amend and reenact ?11-21-12 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to exempting military retirement income from personal income tax after specified date.

At the request of Senator Ferns, and by unanimous consent, reference of the bill to a committee was dispensed with, and it was taken up for immediate consideration, read a first time and ordered to second reading.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the constitutional rule requiring a bill to be read on three separate days was suspended by a vote of four fifths of the members present, taken by yeas and nays.

On suspending the constitutional rule, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

The bill was read a second time and ordered to third reading.

Having been engrossed, the bill (Eng. H. B. 201) was then read a third time and put upon its passage.

Senator Ojeda requested a ruling from the Chair as to whether he should be excused from voting under Senate Rule 43, as he is a military member.

The Chair replied that any impact on Senator Ojeda would be as a member of a class of persons and that he would be required to vote.

On the passage of the bill, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, a majority of all the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. H. B. 201) passed with its title.

Senator Ferns moved that the bill take effect from passage.

On this question, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, two thirds of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. H. B. 201) takes effect from passage.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the passage by that body, to take effect from passage, and requested the concurrence of the Senate in the passage of

Eng. House Bill 203?A Bill to amend and reenact ?11-21-8a and ?11-21-8e of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; and to amend and reenact ?11-24-23a and ?11-24-23e of said code, all relating generally to tax credits for rehabilitation of historic buildings and structures; increasing the amount of tax credit against personal and corporate net income taxes from ten percent to twenty-five percent for expenditures made on or after December 31, 2017; providing for the use of tax credit on or after January 1, 2020; prohibiting eligibility for credit if the taxpayer is in arrears or delinquent on certain tax payments; directing rule-making by the Tax Commissioner; eliminating allowance of tax credits after December 31, 2022; allowing prior authorized tax credits to be claimed; limiting the maximum amount available for tax credit per project and in the aggregate per West Virginia state fiscal year; requiring the state historic preservation officer to reserve a certain amount of available tax credits for projects where proposed tax credits will not exceed $500,000 per project; authorizing the state historic preservation officer to reallocate unused credits reserved for certain projects; modifying carry-back and carry-forward provisions for tax credits; providing requirements and procedures for the allocation and issuance of tax credit reservations and certificates by the state historic preservation officer; establishing requirements to claim tax credits; requiring the state historic preservation officer to prescribe and publish a form and instructions for applications for credits; providing for an application fee payable to the state historic preservation officer; establishing and providing for the administration of and expenditures from a special revenue account; and providing time limits for certain actions of the state historic preservation officer.

At the request of Senator Ferns, and by unanimous consent, reference of the bill to a committee was dispensed with, and it was taken up for immediate consideration, read a first time and ordered to second reading.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the constitutional rule requiring a bill to be read on three separate days was suspended by a vote of four fifths of the members present, taken by yeas and nays.

On suspending the constitutional rule, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

The bill was read a second time and ordered to third reading.

Having been engrossed, the bill (Eng. H. B. 203) was then read a third time and put upon its passage.

Pending discussion,

The question being ?Shall Engrossed House Bill 203 pass??

On the passage of the bill, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, a majority of all the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. H. B. 203) passed with its title.

Senator Ferns moved that the bill take effect from passage.

On this question, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, two thirds of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. H. B. 203) takes effect from passage.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate.

Thereafter, at the request of Senator Weld, and by unanimous consent, the remarks by Senators Ferns and Jeffries regarding the passage of Engrossed House Bill 203 were ordered printed in the Appendix to the Journal.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the passage by that body, to take effect from passage, and requested the concurrence of the Senate in the passage of

Eng. House Bill 205?A Bill to amend and reenact ?21-1C-2, ?21-1C-4, and ?21-1C-6 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all relating generally to the West Virginia Jobs Act; defining terms; requiring Workforce West Virginia to provide a waiver to an employer if unable to refer certain amount of qualified job applicants to the employer within three business days; increasing and adding civil penalties for violations; providing for written notice of violation to employer for violations; creating a special revenue account; and other technical corrections.

At the request of Senator Ferns, and by unanimous consent, reference of the bill to a committee was dispensed with, and it was taken up for immediate consideration, read a first time and ordered to second reading.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the constitutional rule requiring a bill to be read on three separate days was suspended by a vote of four fifths of the members present, taken by yeas and nays.

On suspending the constitutional rule, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

The bill was read a second time and ordered to third reading.

Having been engrossed, the bill (Eng. H. B. 205) was then read a third time and put upon its passage.

On the passage of the bill, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, a majority of all the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. H. B. 205) passed with its title.

Senator Ferns moved that the bill take effect from passage.

On this question, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Beach, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Karnes, Mann, Maroney, Maynard, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Swope, Sypolt, Takubo, Trump, Unger, Weld, Woelfel and Carmichael (Mr. President)?33.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Clements?1.

So, two thirds of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. H. B. 205) takes effect from passage.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the Senate recessed until 6 p.m. today.

??????????? Upon expiration of the recess, the Senate reconvened and, without objection, returned to the third order of business.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the concurrence by that body in the Senate amendments to the House of Delegates amendments to, and the passage as amended, to take effect from passage, of

Eng. Senate Bill 2002, Allowing certain tax information be shared with designated DOH employees.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the amendment by that body, passage as amended, to take effect from passage, and requested the concurrence of the Senate in the House of Delegates amendments, as to

Eng. Senate Bill 2003, Implementing special hiring procedures for DOH and Tax Division.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the bill was taken up for immediate consideration.

The following House of Delegates amendments to the bill were reported by the Clerk:

On page six, section eight, line seventy-seven, by striking out the words ?articles six and six-a? and inserting in lieu thereof the words ?article six?;

On page six, section eight, lines eighty-six and eighty-seven, by striking out the words ?or article six-a?;

On page nine, section twenty-four, line seventy-three, by striking out the words ?articles six and six-a? and inserting in lieu thereof the words ?article six?;

And,

On page nine, section twenty-four, line eighty-six, by striking out the words ?or article six-a?.

On motion of Senator Ferns, the Senate concurred in the House of Delegates amendments to the bill.

Engrossed Senate Bill 2003, as amended by the House of Delegates, was then put upon its passage.

On the passage of the bill, the yeas were: Baldwin, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Mann, Maynard, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Swope, Sypolt, Trump, Unger, Weld and Carmichael (Mr. President)?21.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Azinger, Beach, Clements, Karnes, Maroney, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Rucker, Smith, Stollings, Takubo and Woelfel?13.

So, a majority of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2003) passed with its title.

Senator Ferns moved that the bill take effect from passage.

On this question, the yeas were: Azinger, Baldwin, Blair, Boley, Boso, Cline, Drennan, Facemire, Ferns, Gaunch, Jeffries, Mann, Maynard, Plymale, Prezioso, Romano, Smith, Swope, Sypolt, Trump, Unger, Weld and Carmichael (Mr. President)?23.

The nays were: None.

Absent: Beach, Clements, Karnes, Maroney, Mullins, Ojeda, Palumbo, Rucker, Stollings, Takubo and Woelfel?11.

So, two thirds of all the members elected to the Senate having voted in the affirmative, the President declared the bill (Eng. S. B. 2003) takes effect from passage.

Ordered, That The Clerk communicate to the House of Delegates the action of the Senate.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the concurrence by that body in the passage of, to take effect from passage, of

Eng. Senate Bill 2005, Finding and declaring claim against state.

A message from The Clerk of the House of Delegates announced the concurrence by that body in the adoption of

Senate Concurrent Resolution 201, Authorizing adjournments of Senate and House of Delegates.

Under authority of Senate Concurrent Resolution 201, hereinbefore adopted,

On motion of Senator Ferns, the Senate adjourned until Monday, November 13, 2017, at 12 Noon.

__________

This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.  |  Terms of Use  |   Email WebmasterWebmaster   |   © 2024 West Virginia Legislature **


X

Print On Demand

Name:
Email:
Phone:

Print
X

PDF Not Ready Yet!

Please try later. The PDF file you requested is not available at the present time.
OK