SB10 SFA Ojeda 1-30 #1
Senator Ojeda moved to amend the amendment on page seventeen, section one, after line one hundred sixty-seven, by inserting a new subsection, designated subsection (h), to read as follows:
(h) The commission shall have jurisdiction to ensure the Internet remains open within this state, as detailed in the West Virginia Net Neutrality Act contained in §24-9-1, et seq. of this code.;
On page twenty-five, after section four-b, by inserting a new article, designated article nine, to read as follows:
Article 9. West Virginia Net Neutrality Act.
§24-9-1. Short title.
This article shall be known as the West Virginia Net Neutrality Act.
For the purposes of this article, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the following terms are defined as follows:
“Broadband Internet access service” means a mass-market retail service by wire or radio that provides the capability to transmit data to and receive data from all or substantially all Internet endpoints, including capabilities that are incidental to and enable the operation of the communications service, but excluding dial-up Internet access service. The term also encompasses any service that the federal communications commission finds to be providing a functional equivalent of such a broadband Internet access service. The term also encompasses any service that is used to evade the protections set forth in this article.
“Edge provider” means any individual or entity that provides any content, application, or service over the Internet, and any individual or entity that provides a device used for accessing any content, application, or service over the Internet.
“End user” means any individual or entity that uses a broadband Internet access service.
“Mobile broadband Internet access service” means a broadband Internet service that serves end users primarily using mobile stations.
“Paid prioritization” means the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including the use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either: (1) In exchange for consideration, monetary or otherwise, from a third party; or (2) to benefit an affiliated entity.
“Reasonable network management” means a practice that has a primarily technical network management justification, but does not include other business practices. A network management practice is reasonable if it is primarily used for and tailored to achieving a legitimate network management purpose, taking into account the particular network architecture and technology of the Broadband Internet Access Service.
§24-9-3. Broadband Internet access service provider requirements.
(a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service in this state shall publicly disclose accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of its broadband Internet access services sufficient for consumers to make informed choices regarding use of such services and for content, application, service, and device providers to develop, market, and maintain internet offerings.
(b) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet service in this state, insofar as such a person is so engaged, may not:
(1) Block lawful content, applications, services, or nonharmful devices, subject to reasonable network management;
(2) Impair or degrade lawful internet traffic on the basis of internet content, application, or service, or use of a nonharmful device, subject to reasonable network management;
(3) Engage in paid prioritization; or
(4) Unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage: (A) End users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice; or (B) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users.
(c) The Public Service Commission may waive the prohibition on paid prioritization contained in this section only if the petitioner demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet in this state.
§24-9-4. Consumer protection.
(a) The matters contained in this article are vitally important to the consumers of this state and the public interest. Therefore, a violation of this article is deemed to be an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act, contained in chapter 46A of this code, and may be brought by consumers in a private civil action. The penalties and remedies contained in the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act shall apply to this article as if the entirety of chapter 46A were repeated herein.
(b) All receipts recovered on behalf of the state by the Office of the Attorney General for lawsuits related to violations of this article shall be deposited into the Broadband Enhancement Fund, created in §31G-1-5 of this code.