WEST virginia legislature
2020 regular session
Introduced
Senate Bill 75
By Senators Baldwin and Jeffries
[Introduced January 8, 2020; referred
to the Committee on Energy, Industry, and Mining; and then to the Committee on
the Judiciary]
A BILL to amend and reenact §54-2-9 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to changing the determination of just compensation to be paid to the landowner when eminent domain is used for a pipeline.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 2. PROCEDURE.
§54-2-9. Report of commissioners.
The commissioners, after
viewing the property, if a view is demanded, and hearing any proper evidence
which is offered shall ascertain what will be a just compensation to the person
entitled thereto for so much thereof as is proposed to be taken, or for the
interest therein, if less than a fee is proposed to be taken, and for
damage to the residue of the tract beyond all benefits to be derived, in
respect to such the residue, from the work to be constructed, or
the purpose to which the land to be taken is to be appropriated. including
When less than the fee is taken, the actual damage, if any, done, or that may
be done, to the fee by such the construction shall be included.
and
When the interest in
property is for a pipeline, unless the pipeline directly connects to a
residential or commercial end user, just compensation shall be determined by
the value of the pipeline across the property to the owner of the pipeline or
the owner of the beneficial interest in the pipeline or by the value of the
owner of the property interest taken, whichever is higher. Instead of a
one-time payment, payments over time contingent upon the value of the pipeline
over time may be awarded. The commissioners shall make report to the following effect: We, the
commissioners, appointed by the circuit court of ............ county, (or by
the judge thereof in vacation, as the case may be) by an order made on the
........ day of ........ on the application of ............... respectfully
report, that having first been duly sworn, we have viewed the real estate owned
by ..............., mentioned in the said application, and are of
opinion that ........ dollars will be a just compensation for so much of the
said real estate as is proposed to be taken by the said applicant, that
is to say: (here describe the part to be taken, and the interest therein, if
less than a fee, so as to identify the same with reasonable certainty, which
description may be supplemented by reference to a plat annexed to the report,
or in any manner that would be sufficient in a conveyance) as well as for
damages to the residue of the said real estate beyond all benefits which
will be derived in respect to such the residue from the work to
be constructed (or from the purposes to which the part to be taken by said
the applicant is to be appropriated).
Given under our hands this ........ day of .............
But if the property is
proposed to be taken by a company incorporated for construction of a railroad,
no damages shall may be ascertained for the construction of any
farm crossing, fences, or cattle guards, or for keeping the same in repair. The
report shall be signed by at least three of the commissioners, and forthwith
returned to the clerk's office of the court, to be filed with the papers of the
case.
NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to change the determination of "just compensation" to be paid to the landowner when eminent domain is used for a pipeline and the pipeline does not connect directly to a residential or commercial end user. Currently the common law provides that the just compensation paid to the landowner is the value to the land owners of the interest taken before the pipeline was proposed. Under the bill the just compensation will be the higher of either the value to the landowner of the landowner's interest taken or the value of the pipeline to the person or entity seeking to use eminent domain for the pipeline. And regular payments contingent upon the value of the pipeline over time may be awarded.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.